• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I know it would be covenient to accept this meme as true, but it very much isn’t.

    Just like insurance companies in the US don’t cover everything you need, sometimes even lifesaving treatment, the same (though less extreme) happens in nearly all public health systems.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 minutes ago

      Having lived in two countries with universal healthcare, that meme is absolutelly true and you’re the one bullshitting.

      The most “extreme” it can get in such systems is that they won’t pay for very expensive treatments (i.e. the kind of stuff that costs a million dollars per shot) if a person can keep going with cheaper ones even if they’re not as good.

      Even then, sometimes they will if it’s actually worth it (as in: for something that’s a cure, not for something that just keeps the patiet going and is only 10% better than the next best option whilst costing 1000x more).

      That’s “your quality of life won’t be as good if you have a chronic disease that makes your life miserable and the best treatment in the market is insanelly expensive because they’ll only pay for a not as expensive one”, not “death panels”.

      People in those countries absolutelly aren’t going bankrupt due to being denied life-saving treatment and having to pay for it from their own pocket.

      As for any complains you might have heard from people in countries with universal healthcare, them complaining about it is like people in Scandinavia complaining about public services: relative to what they have there are bad parts, which is something altogether different than it being bad relative to the World and when it comes the healthcare the US is 3rd World when it comes to results delivered relative to the amount spent in it.

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Sorry then.

        I guess me living my entire life in a system with universal healthcare, being denied treatments that could have prevented me going deaf and needing a feeding tube is all in my imagination.

        The treatments for these werent extreme. It was a fairly simple drug therapy that costs around 5’000 Euro per year and is sold in my country.

        It just isn’t on the list of drugs covered by public health insurance. As I’m surviving on 12k per year disability benefits, I could not afford the treatment.

        But just because it never impacted you you assume my experience doesn’t exist, because you have the privilege that the system never didn’t work for you, so you assume it works for everyone.

    • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      I don’t think there is a public health system when you are just expected to fork over half a million for an operation. Those insane healthcare prices are uniquely US phenomenon

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I mean there’s definitely people who go bankrupt due to not being able to work due to illness. If you’re a private entrepreneur (or what’s the correct term E; self-employed was what I meant) for example then that stuff can take you down easily.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        If you’re self-employed entrepreneur then it’d be a personal bankruptcy most of the time in Finland. Having an LLC or such thing for such use isn’t common.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes, that’s true. Many countries have subsidies, but especially if it’s a significant one who needs constant care, they can’t cover everything.

      Still, likely a rounding error compared with the US if we consider those who become unable to work due to treatable conditions they can’t afford (and their insurance delays, denies and defends)

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s also that if you get sick at the wrong time, as a self-employed person, that alone can take you down and cause a bankruptcy. Subsidies won’t help there if the work just isn’t getting done or you miss out on work contracts.

  • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I don’t know about the other countries, but In France there definitely still are problems, check this recent story https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/a-la-une/on-lui-refuse-l-acces-aux-urgences-elle-accouche-sur-le-parking-de-l-hopital

    A pregnant women was refused entrance to a private hospital she was forced to give birth on the parking lot in front of the entrance.

    Sure the USA have an awful system but it doesn’t mean it’s perfect everywhere else. There are people that are bankrupt because of medical treatment here too. And we also have corrupt CEOs making it worse

    Every country needs a Luigi.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      USA have an awful system but it doesn’t mean it’s perfect everywhere else

      I don’t think that’s the message in this post either, so… The message is, it’s just far, far worse with the system they have, due to all healthcare being privatized.

      At least that is my understanding. 🤷‍♂️

      • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes of course,

        I replied to this post because it is one of many making bold claims about healthcare in other countries than the US, most of the times claims about European countries healthcare made by US users are false and/or misleading.

        Sure the US has a very bad system, I see it and recognize how bad it is, but it’s a tad annoying to see stuff like that, that falsely say we have “0” bankruptcy or that “everything” is covered by public healthcare, that our life expectancy is that much higher, etc… Most claims are unsourced and blatantly false or largely inflated for shock value.

        In France for example we have many issues with our public healthcare, not everything is covered (dental isn’t for example), we aren’t covered for the full amount unless we pay for private coverage on top (called “mutuelle”) which often are linked to your employer, we have to pay up front and then get reimbursed later, geographically there are areas with very few hospitals, the poorer often can’t afford to be sick because we aren’t always automatically paid for sick days at work, there’s a shortage of medical fields’ workers, and our current political leaders have been making it worse for decades…

        All that to say that from the perspective of a “European” citizen, these posts about the US system compared with ours feels like propaganda that “we should be happy with what we have” even though we really shouldn’t, using false information.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Very good points. I haven’t seen many other posts regarding this, so I just saw it in this isolated context.

          But still, even with the flaws in our European systems, most of them are far superior to the US. The insane amounts you get charged for a simple accident can be hilarious. It’s like, breaking a leg costs the same as buying a car. It shouldn’t be that way. :-( Especially when the accident is caused by someone else.

          But, you’re not wrong. 👍 No system is perfect, definitely. Our healthcare system in my country is silently on the verge of collapse because the wages are so low. So employees are quitting left and right, because the stress and workload is not worth the pay. Yet there is a requirement to offer healthcare, so they hire fill-in workers that cost waaaaaay more, so the cost still goes up either way for the employers, yet the net number of workers is also fewer than before. So they are paying more money for less workers, instead of just paying proper salaries for the ones that are actually employed.

          It’s ridiculous. They’d rather spend 2x money than pay x money, for the principle. Just a big 🖕 to the workforce.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t speak French. Why didn’t she go to the public one? Why was she forced to give birth on the parking? Why not call an ambulance?

      Unpopular opinion incoming: I can understand if they didn’t allow her in in a PRIVATE one if she was not covered.

      • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        She was too far gone to be able to go to the nearest public one.

        It’s actually a huge scandal in France, we have laws preventing this, and the hospital is pretending that it was a mistake from an individual employee to refuse her.

  • rbn@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I know it’s probably a bit exaggerated on purpose but also in European countries it’s definitely not zero. We are in a significantly better situation than the US, that’s fot sure. Our problems aren’t remotely comparable. But also here, it can happen that certain treatments aren’t covered, also here there are (few) people without health insurance and also here people can lose their job or never find a job in the first place due to illness related issues or disabilities.

    As said, much better but also definitely not 0.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There’s also the issue of waiting times - you might need care somewhat urgently, but need to either wait for multiple months or pay (or hope that when the issue becomes more immediately life-threatening they can handle it in time). Public healthcare isn’t perfect, and at least in many places still needs a lot of work.

      • usrtrv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I always dislike this take because it pretends the US doesn’t have this exact issue. I’ve known people with less than ideal insurance who had very few doctors to pick from in-network and would take months to get an appointment.

        Long wait times still happens in the US. Just like it can happen in public healthcare.

      • jessca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Pedant rant:

        I take issue with ‘needs a lot of work’, though it is common phrasing. It promotes the false idea that ‘business is more efficient’ by making it sound like the public administrators are too dumb to know how to do their job.

        The real issue, in most jurisdictions, is that it needs more and stable funding, and less political interference.

        • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well that and not to mention that politicians abroad do the exact same thing they do in the US. I know the British for instance have a Conservative Party that have repeatedly attacked their healthcare system in order to make privatized insurance seem better.

          And then the issues caused by a lack of funding get used in the US to say “SEE! This system doesn’t work!”

          Which is the logical equivalent of watching your friend baking pies with not enough filling and deciding to instead pay 4x the price for a pie that you won’t even get your promised slice of. Oh and the pie you get occasionally is made with the meat of other people who were also promised a pie and paid for it.

          • oo1@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            yes, and the latest “conservative” assailants on UK (maybe mostly English) health system wear red roses on their lapels.

            They all see a giant unmilked cash cow wandering around in a short skirt.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The good thing is that it creates a great competition for the privates. I have a very good insurance for 1K a year. No extra payments. Can go as much as I want. Many locations included. For “small” or “quick”, I go to the private one. Saves me time and reduces waiting times for public.

  • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s almost like … universal healthcare would make our economy stronger and the insurance companies are the leaches…

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Some people don’t want universal health care because they don’t want their taxes going towards other people’s health care. What they seem to fail to understand is that the exact same thing happens with private health insurance, and some of the money goes towards the insurance company’s profits. Universal health care would make things cheaper.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, they don’t want people who don’t “contribute” to benefit off THEIR money!

        What if… GASP, an ILLEGAL would benefit off their money??? Because you know, those illegals are just on all the gov files and they can strode into places and say “giv me moneyz” and we can’t do anything about it!

        It’s purely down to not wanting to help others below them. Irony is not part of their vocabulary.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apparently no one is 100% sure whether bloodsucking worms were named after doctors that used them, or doctors were named after the blood sucking worms that they commonly prescribed.

      “Leech” being an old timey name for a medical doctor, possibly predating the term “doctor” which just came from “teacher” like “doctrine” or something.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Americans: It’s all that gosh-darn SOCIALISM that’s causing this mess! Because socialism is when all the rich fat cats at the top keep all the earnings for themselves. Fucking dirtbag woke socialists!


    And no lessons were learned that day.

    Even Mangione has proved undoubtedly that he doesn’t entirely understand the very issue that radicalized him. (If he isn’t just a patsy, of course)

    • LukeS26 (He/They)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think he’s just kinda an ordinary person who grew up privileged. He has fairly standard techbro style libertarian beliefs, but he also has criticisms of some of the influencers he watches, and didn’t seem to like Peterson very much. He also seems to be an environmentalist, and I think he seemed to have become more anti-corporation based on the manifesto released (obviously assuming he did it).

      Him being a privileged but ordinary guy who still got radicalized reflects a lot more strongly on the plight of everyone who isn’t one of the owner class. It doesn’t matter that he was relatively wealthy, he still wasn’t one of them.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What information has come out that makes you say the last paragraph? I’m not doubting it’s validity in the slightest (I don’t think this guy is exactly an infallible source of wisdom), just haven’t seen a lot directly from him that would flesh his views out that much.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        He was pretty pro-Musk and pro-Peter Thiel and certainly wasn’t a paragon of leftist thought. While being decently educated and well traveled, he seemed to have a lot of faith in technolibertarian ideals.

        I’d say that’s clear from his Twitter and Reddit histories. It doesn’t mean he’s a frothing-at-the-mouth MAGA nut, but it also doesn’t mean he’s a dyed-in-the-wool leftist who understands the issues.

        Further, like most people, he only became radicalized when a serious injury impacted his own life. It didn’t make him question the whole system of capitalism, just healthcare.

        And all that’s fine and not meant to be an indictment one way or another about the guy, but more it’s meant to point out that like most Americans, he’s seemingly a little confused about larger issues. Which also makes sense since he’s only 26, learning about it all takes time.

        Finally, I’m still not 100% convinced a bunch of this is just contrived police bullshit to pin it on a patsy, and that’s why his motives seem confused. Although I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s just lacking education and confused, like most Americans.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 hours ago

          he seemed to have a lot of faith in technolibertarian ideals.

          he did not site musk in the supposed “manifesto”.

          he did site some other people, not sure who. i think that would more indicative on his position.

          i have hard time believing any of this but this he is alt right narrative is secondary to his act of revolt. it aint like he can do the entire capitalist in one job. he picked his target and simple, direct message.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s an easy 6 billion profit! Just pick them up in an ambulance and have them overnight for an upset stomach ulcer.

  • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    OK, i need to chime in here, there is illness related work loss here in Canada. Also, you can go bankrupt from dental work if you cannot afford dental insurance or your job doesn’t offer it (which most jobs that are not union/higher corp don’t). You can literally die from poor dental hygiene, and even if you brush your teeth every day and floss, that doesn’t mean your scott free from visiting the dentist.

  • Theo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So, no one in those countries became homeless and bankrupt because of an illness and lost their job? I am asking genuinely because I wouldn’t know.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      This is hyperbole. Healthcare cost might be covered, but there are a lot more expenses with being sick. Social support and housing support in the UK is laughable. Good luck if you cant work because of disability. The hospital will keep you alive…and then discharge you to the street.

      Still better than America though.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        True … even here in Canada social systems are not as good as they could be … but imagine trying to access shitty social services AND PAYING FOR MEDICAL SERVICES… or worse being in over your head because of medical debt!

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Met a homeless guy once who had had his jaw broken over some change. Even he was able to go to the hospital to get fixed up. It didn’t solve his myriad other problems but at least even he could get that taken care of.

          Any system which would have turned him away should be burned to the ground and the people who built said system should have the flesh flayed from their bones, slowly.

          • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            … or … just take away all their money, wealth, connections, opportunities and not allow anyone to help them … then throw them on the street in Detroit and break their jaw.

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I could be convinced of that. I still want flay a couple of them, though. People like Elon just need to be fucking erased, honestly.

        • Theo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          But how is access to medical and mental health treatment and options for it? Is there a ton of variety?

      • Theo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Does UK have any social security disability or retirement other than what is relied upon by an employer? Just wondering.

          • Theo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Seems about equal to Social security disability but, SS is worse because they don’t really tailor your payments to your housing expenses and needs. If they did, the government might even save money. I know people around me that just use most of their check for weed. If it was guaranteed to only cover your bills with a smaller spending allowance and they asked for monthly bank records to prove you were using government money wisely, there would be less freeloaders and more reserve for those who retire and have paid into it. More people who proved they could work, or who abused the system would be called out and forced to work, and those with true disabilities could stay on it.

            • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I know people around me that just use most of their check for weed.

              not really any of your business. if they are able to arrange where they have spending money good for them.

              i don’t even support SS but this thinking is paternalistic since you don’t know their personal financial situation. but the judgement is heavy

              • Theo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                My point was that they can work, some of them have under the table jobs to begin with and they are abusing the system. Ss will occasionally audit and ask for random bank statements anyway. Not my business but it is the government’s if the money comes from them (technically we who work and pay into it anyway). They don’t give the money to pay for weed they give it to support you-- barely.

    • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In Japan if you work full time for a larger employer, you pay into “shakai hoken” (societal insurance) this pays you like a third of your salary if you get injured and have to refrain from work for awhile. (This is at least partially paid for by your company because you can only legally be fired in Japan if the company proves beyond a reasonable doubt you were either belligerent or the company couldn’t survive without you)

    • shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      When my dad was diagnosed with late stage prostate cancer they assembled a team for him, got him all the tests and scans and began treatment essentially immediately. Uncle with leukaemia was basically the same experience. He had a bone marrow transplant in addition to all the regular chemo stuff. Total bill came to $0 but they do gouge you for parking. Need a joint replacement? You’re gonna have to wait, but for life and death you get the treatment you need pretty quick

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Americans: … OH YEAH! … now lets count how many Aircraft Carriers each country has!! … U! … S! … A! … U! … S! … A! … U! … S! … A! … pulls a muscle from over exerting themselves, has to go to the hospital and pay for treatment

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s a free country … as long as you can afford it

        … and also …

        “That’s why they call it the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it.” - George Carlin

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If that’s the lesson then when were we supposed to learn it? I am old enough to remember very well the last time Democrats tried to do something about healthcare. They gave up on single payer before the debate even started. Was that when I was supposed to learn to vote for them harder or was it one of the times they fucked over the only person with actual plans to implement universal healthcare?

      Yes, Democrats are clearly better than the fascists masquerading as conservatives, but that doesn’t mean they’re fighting the good fight. They don’t even try to force a vote on most things people actually care about. They just throw up their hands and complain that doing things is hard. Then everyone sits around blaming voters for not loving these ineffectual dipshits enough. Fuck that, they suck it’s been that way for a lot more than 12 years.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        When Democrats had 60 votes one DNC Senator, Joe Liebermen, stopped singlepayer from passing.

        Joe died in 2013 at the ripe old age of 82.

        Every single Republican voted No on singlepayer. They also voted No on the Medicaid Expansion and Protections for pre-existing conditions. Republicans continue to tell us repeatedly that they want to gut Medicaid and that Medicare for the elderly is also on the chopping block, but they haven’t been able to get 60 votes, yet.

        So the answer to your question of when is: Every Goddamn Year. If you want Single Payer then just elect 60 Dems to the senate, OR just 10 to 13 anybody else who is willing to vote for Single Payer, and if one of them still betrays us then elect a few more. We have privatized healthcare because voters are voting for politicians who want privatized healthcare, simple as.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The amount of misinformation about this guy…

          Joe Lieberman had been an independent for years when he voted against single payer, and he died in 2024, after 11 years of retirement.

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              You’re good, I meant it literally about disinformation, so I don’t doubt you read it somewhere that seemed credible.

              I’m from Connecticut, and we’re all still mad about it, so it always sticks out to me when someone thinks he was a democrat at the time (he did generally caucus with democrats, but was very pro-business. He was not elected again.

  • tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Lol there are definitely treatments that are very expensive and not covered by some insurances. This is not a “statistic”, just opinion. USA has it way worse of course. But I remember my dad having to lend money from friends because some of my mom’s cancer treatments were not covered.

    Edit: Also wtf why is this in shitpost