• REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    How does this unscientific instagram vomit has 500 votes on lemmy? Are we turning into reddit?

  • wampus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nah, this isn’t a great point at all… even at face value really.

    Put slightly differently, if we’re assuming people sleep around as much as the text implies, if we focus on birth control solely for men, then one ‘failure’/non-controlled man would result in a ton of pregnancies. If the onus is on women, then one ‘failure’/non-controlled woman would result in one pregnancy.

  • Pika@rekabu.ru
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m actually waiting for male birth control pills so bad

    They would give men more agency on reproduction, aside from vasectomy, which is permanent, and condoms, which can rip or be intentionally poked.

    Also, they can be used in couples where a woman is hesitant to take pills herself, either out of reproductive concerns (fear that pills would make them permanently sterile), or the overall influence of hormones on the body and the menstrual cycle.

  • qaatloz@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not really…

    On the biological level it is trying to stop millions of sperm-cells to sneak in or prevent one egg-cell from being available. In the numbers game it is less risky and more reliable to make the one cell unavailable then to try to prevent the millions from being viable. Even if you shut 99.99% of them down, you still have more risk than having 99.99% chance of preventing the one cell being available.

    I’m afraid that however we want the world to be equal for man and women, the biology itself is unfair and needs a lot more time and research if you want to equalize that.

    Or use the tie-off snipsnip solution. It is a bit more permanent, but is pretty reliable in preventing.

  • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Counterpoint: a woman taking birthcontrol is empowered because she is taking charge of her own reproduction. She doesn’t have to rely on or trust the man to take his pill. After all, she would be the one bearing most of the burden in case of an unwanted pregnancy.

    Additionally, purely biologically it is much easier to reliably stop conception on the female side than on the male side. A woman only produces one egg cell per month, whereas a man produces millions of sperm cells per day.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not sure who’s she targeting because I know a lot of guys who would love to have birth control pills.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s easier to prevent ovulation of one egg than stop a billion sperm cells from reaching their destination. Stop politicising biology.

  • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    The one who gets pregnant should probably take the birth control, as pregnancy would be more bothersome for them than for the other person.

  • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    Counter point, all men are rapists(according to the wisdom of the internet). Therefore, birth control is protection against the onslaught of unwanted semen that comes from all the endless rape.

    Or, if you arent a perpetually online moron, birth control allows women to control their reproduction. Its a symbol of liberation and freedom for women, who can now enjoy sex at their want without worry of pregnancy.

    In over words, shes making a shit point. This is like all the clueless cunts moaning about women in short skirts in Star Trek, not realising the the mini skirt was a symbol of sexual liberation for the time.

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s less of a conspiracy and more that it didn’t even occur to society until pretty recently (in historical terms) that reproduction isn’t solely a woman’s responsibility

        • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          This sounds like it would make sense on the surface, but is just not true. You can look up pretty easily that there wasn’t really any research on the viability of male hormonal birth control until half a century after female hormonal birth control became a thing, so it’s not like they made a rational decision based on scientific findings. When they found out how to do it for men, it was roughly comparably complicated, with similar side effects. This too is easy to look up.

          It makes sense that the side effects were too much to legalize hormonal male birth control because today’s standards are much higher. Which is a good thing ofc- im glad they don’t allow new medication as easily as they did in the past. Female birth control wouldn’t be legalized if it was invented today, and neither would, for example, aspirin. They get to stay around because they don’t take that stuff back out usually, even if it wouldn’t pass modern standards. That’s a bit of a tangent though.

          • Scirocco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Many men would LOVE a reliable, non-condom, male-controlled birth control method

            Currently for men there are two options — condoms, which are problematic and difficult in several ways, or vasectomy, which is essentially permanent or at least difficult and uncertain to be reversed.

            The third method is to take WAY too many TOO HOT baths, but that also has uncertainty and is a real hassle.

            As it stands, really for men they either need to use a condom, or trust that your female partner is reliable.

      • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is that why men have been wrapping their dicks in all sorts of weird shit for thousands of years? Animal intestines and bladders to name but a few. Fuck your “in historical terms”, youre talking out of your arse, just like every other sexist who makes hating men part of their personality.

        • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Why is everyone in this thread acting like men are always the ones providing and insisting on using barrier methods? Have yall talked to a woman who’s had casual sex before about what it’s like out there?

          • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, men AND women are both taking responsibility. Just because you can point to few cases of morons, doesnt make “women are sluts who use abortion as birth control” anymore true than the bullshit youre pedalling. But nice try, trying to get out of the “historical terms” bullshit, but shifting the focus to modern day… Doesnt at all make you look desperate to be right, regardless of facts…

            Theres bad apples in every bunch. Only a bigot tries to frame that bad apple as the whole bunch.

            • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ok I’ll ignore the name calling one last time.

              I’ll put it super simply, in the hope that you misunderstanding me wasn’t as intentional as it comes across

              1. barrier methods have always been, and continue to be, a shared responsibility

              2. all other non-permanent methods have been purely on women until very recently.

              • Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Ignore whatever the fuck you like. Youre bigoted cunt, and thats all there is to it. You dont like being called out? Have you tried, not being a perpetually online sexist piece of shit? Fuck you.

                • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Can you please point out the thing I said that you consider sexist, and why? I’m striving not to be, and like to learn where I can.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I do think that birth control pills having 1 week of sugar pills to force periods rather than 1 week of optional pills to allow skipping periods is pretty fucked up though. The term conspiracy is pretty intense though. But it’s super fucked.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sounds like a logistical problem, not a medical problem.

            I used the word should.

            As in the system right now is flawed and could be better.

            What point are you trying to make because I’m not picking up on what you are putting down

  • iconic_admin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m pretty sure the birth control pill is for women because that was easy to do. A pill for men has been tried several times and they still don’t exist yet.

  • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    The most commonly produced, available, and used birth control method worldwide is the latex condom, used by everyone who has a penis. Try again.