You are a hero

  • vocornflakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Any Inkscape pros know the best way to combine two pdfs using it? The page creation menus are clunky to me, and it’s hard to keep the pages in order.

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m not a pro but do some shit from time to time. Between Inkscape and Gimp I never needed anything else for images. Of onlh Gimp had better tools for animated gifs… still serviceable tho haven’t tried the new Gimp yet.

  • twt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The only time I used Adobe Illustrator was when it was brand new, in 1987. I may have used early versions of Photoshop, but never as my “daily driver.” So I might not be the most knowledgeable about Adobe software.

    But the thing I MOST resent Adobe for was buying and killing Macromedia… I really really liked Macromedia Fireworks (raster, vector, and object graphics editor). Fireworks could do a lot of the things Adobe software could for a fraction of the price AND without having to use multiple applications to get the job done.

    Inkscape is remarkable, and maybe someday someone will merge some raster image object tools into it, and then it might begin to resemble the Fireworks of 20 years ago when Adobe killed it.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Thank you, Mr. Owens. From the bottom of my heart. InkScape is my favourite graphics tool.

  • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    390
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I disagree with that framing, someone not buying your shit is not the same as you losing money. Inkscape saved millions for graphic designers, which is very different. Adobe was not entitled to that money, you can’t lose something that was never yours.

    • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      163
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Subtle distinction, but actually pretty huge. I agree with you. Companies also use this to say that pirating is stealing, when they never had the business in the first place.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Exactly. I’m pirating because I can’t afford to pay hundreds of dollars each month to watch all the movies and shows that I do. If I didn’t have the opportunity to pirate, I still wouldn’t afford it legitimately…

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          It’s also a great way to demo games and other software if you can afford it before you waste money on something that has no value to you. This is especially useful when you’re on a tight budget.

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You are right, of course, but I personally draw a great of pleasure from imaging the CEO of Adobe screaming, “CURSE YOU MARTIN OWENS!!!”

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I had exactly 0 intention of ever buying anything from Adobe.

      Inkscape gave me an alternative to the high seas. And it happens to do everything I need it to, although it’s way more powerful than the simple vector graphics conversions I use it for.

      10/10, Adobe never lost money from me getting Inkscape. They lost the game before they knew I was a player.

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I was prepared to scold you for being pedantic, but upon further reflection, I’ve concluded that you are 100% correct, and your point is germane to the conversation at hand, so you get an upvote instead.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I agree. I would never have bought Adobe, I would have not the little bit of vector drawing I have done.

      I’m grateful for InkScape, but I wouldn’t have bought or downloaded anything otherwise, so I neither saved nor did Adobe lose.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I worked for a company that made MIDI sequencers. Had been making them for decades before I got there, and still making them long after I left.

          One of the first products I worked on, the marketing team decided to put on the box, “World’s first ever MIDI sequencer” 😆

          We almost need a new series called, “Companies Say the Darndest Things” that picks up after the original. I’m sure a lot of the kids in the original show are running these companies now.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Right, it’s akin to saying he stole that money from Adobe the same way the media companies imply that poor people making digital copies of music and movies they wouldn’t be able to afford otherwise is theft.

  • ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve designed banners and flags in Inkscape, convention signage, even electoral campaign materials like business cards, handcards, campaign signs. A great tool

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I appreciate him very much, OSS maintainers and devs dont get enough praise. Also I dont get the intense entitlement some people have towards unpaid OSS devs and mainatiners, they think that they somehow deserve a product equal to that of a corporate offering while not offering any money or code.

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It’s because they haven’t thought about it.

      They’re so used to the paradigm. I pay money. I get product. I get support.

      So when they get the product but they don’t pay money, their brain short circuits and thinks they deserve some kind of support.

      In a capitalistic world, communistic projects are confusing. Which is sad.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        People equate “cost” with “value”. If something has no cost, it has no value. There’s an old story about computer mice that is apt. An electronics store sells computer mice. Some are expensive, some are cheap. The store has found that one specific mouse is really really reliable. Some of the more expensive mice get constant warranty returns or RMA requests. But not this one mouse. This one mouse is built well, feels good, and works great. Every single desk in the store is using one of these mice. And this specific mouse also happens to be extremely cheap. As in, one of the cheapest that the store carries.

        Sales floor employees struggle to sell it, even when they personally use it every day and know it’s a superior product, because customers see the low price and assume it is a low quality product. The customers are directly equating cost with value. And so the store manager does something sort of backwards. They increase the price of the mouse, to be around the same price as the others. Suddenly, this specific mouse is flying off of the shelves. People are now seeing the high price, and assuming that means the mouse is good.

        Another place you experience this is when helping your family with tech support. Every single IT worker has experienced the “you updated Chrome on my computer six months ago, and now it’s broken. You broke my computer” complaint from a tech-illiterate relative. They see a friend or relative with a computer issue, they know how to solve said issue, they try to be helpful, and it blows back on them when the computer breaks in the distant future. This is largely because the IT person didn’t charge said friend or family member for their services.

        In grandma’s eyes, your tech support service were free, so it has no value. You can’t be trusted as a real IT person, because your services are free. Charging a small “friends and family discount” type of thing actually cements in their mind that you do this for a living. You literally do this professionally. Even if you’re only charging them $5 for an hour of work, when you normally get paid $50 per hour. Again, you can call it the friends and family discount if you need to. But by charging them something, all of those “you broke my computer” complaints suddenly dry up. Because now you’re not just the grandson who plays with computers; you’re a professional in a specialized trade. You know what you’re doing, so it couldn’t have been your fault that the computer broke. It’s not really a friends and family discount; it’s a “stop blaming me when you download viruses” fee.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Bingo! I doubled the amount of business I was doing with my side-hustle PC repair by doubling my price. Also, my customers weren’t such a pain in the ass.