If you have investments, let’s treat those as liquid cash for the sake of argument. Otherwise, the assumption is that you’re not selling property or possessions, but continuing to live as you do now.

  • Thoven@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Right now, until next month’s mortgage payment comes due. Every time I get something in the emergency fund either an emergency happens or a maintenance that will be an emergency if ignored. Just ordered a new set of car tires about an hour ago, as it happens.

  • infyrian@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If I was more devoted to my saving, I could probably last a good long while. Like, maybe a couple years worth of just savings, leaving my job and just living worry free. My expenses are moderately low so it’d be stupid easy.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    1-2 years before I need to look at selling the house, although hoping that the mortgage will drop when our 2 year fix ends which could push that time up a bit as that is by far my largest expense.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Cash only, about 6 months. Selling assets, 20 years.

    13 years ago I had to walk 2 hours after work to get home because I didn’t have a pounds to rent a bike (it was a bank holiday and salary was delayed for a day). My family helped me expanding my education and since things skyrocketed.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just ran the numbers for the first time ever, and it adds up to 34 months - which I realize is a pretty privileged place to be. However, I’m by no means rich; I just live well below my means and invest all my savings.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I used to rent a single bedroom in an overcrowded house share, didn’t learn to drive because I couldn’t afford it.

        Had over a year of expenses saved, hardly makes you rich.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Depends on who I compare myself to and how one defines “rich.” To me, it means someone whose passive income exceeds their spending - and I’m nowhere even close to that… yet.

        • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yeah I think that’s where the distinction between rich and wealthy comes in. You still have to work for a living and are closer to homelessness than renting out Venice for a wedding (for instance).

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          This exact question from this thread is how rich are you and 34 months is quite wealthy.

          It’s an important distinction where I’m a potential counter example. I admit it. I earn what ought to be a comfortable living but poor choices in the past (and probably still) mean that I’m only a couple months from financial disaster. And since it would affect my kids education and my old age, the affects would be major. I am clearly not wealthy, mostly due to my own choices

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Surely it depends how you live though. A guy spending just £15 a week on food and living in a tent is not wealthy just because they have £2k in the bank which will cover them for a few years.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              That’s a bit of an edge case but why not? If they earn enough to live the way they want, are secure from immediate financial catastrophe, and can afford some luxuries, then maybe they are wealthy, despite being subsistence

              Meanwhile someone can earn a nice fat six figure salary but be over mortgaged for house and car, not living comfortably, and paycheck to paycheck on the edge of financial disaster. They’re poor, despite it being by their poor choices

              Wealth is freedom from want and financial anxiety

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Nearly everybody who speaks English is rich. We just have no clue who poor other parts of the world are and so think of ourselves as poor.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m in my mid 40’s.

      It’s not particularly uncommon for people in regional Australia to own their own house with no mortgage by my age.

      It’s pretty tough to find a family home that costs less than 10x average wage.

      So, as a kind of line in the sand I’d say maybe a third of 45 year olds living in regional Australia could “survive” for 10 years with no income.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I don’t. I do it the boring way - buying cheap, highly diversified ETF index funds.

          • Toaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            23 hours ago
            1. Open a Vanguard account.
            2. Buy as much of the thing called VOO as you can each month.
            3. Come back at retirement age to oodles of money.
          • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Mutual funds and ETFs are both types of investments that represent a group of individual stocks and are generally managed in some way, either by a person or by a fixed algorithm. Mutual funds have some tax implications that can by annoying for people so ETFs tend to be preferred for taxable accounts (in the US at least).

        • Mothra@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Thanks! Yes, I was wondering where would be a good place to start for absolute noobs, thanks for the tip. Investing is a mystery in my life I’ve been conditioned not to try to understand, perhaps it’s time to do something about it.

          • Nighed@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s not too bad. The key thing if your in the UK is to open a stocks and shares ISA (similar to a cash ISA, but for stocks) that means you don’t have to worry about taxes.

            Other than that… Be aware that things are very volatile due to trump. He can say something and stocks drop 10% then recover by the end of the month… Or not.

            If you are in for the long term, the worst thing you can do is panic and sell when that happens.

          • mesa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Its pretty easy if you go with something like wealthfront, betterment, etc…

            But using something like fidelity is also good too.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Buy into a broad market tracking ETF (something that tracks s&P 500 or 1000 or similar). That way you’re not betting on individual companies, your betting on the collective largest companies in the world doing well. Over a long period of time, which for over a century has averaged ~7% inflation adjusted return yearly.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    A couple months, but

    Basically I’ve been saving up for years to redo a leaky moldy bathroom. That wouldn’t get done. Maybe ever

    I’ve saved what I could to pay for my kids college. I could ruin their entire future to stay alive

    I’m coming up in retirement age with way too little savings. I’ve finally able to put aside enough to catch up a little bit I guess that would go pretty quickly too

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    3 months at the absolute most, likely significantly less, even after cutting out all “luxuries” like paying for internet/phone/electricity/water.

    70% of that would go on rent for my 1-bed flat. And no - I don’t live in a big city. I earn more than most. I spend less than most. I don’t use any subscription services and I pirate everything. I don’t drink, and I never go out to pubs, cinema, (insert paid activity here) because all of that is way too expensive.

    The UK is fucked.

    Literally the only thing that decides how long I can live is whether or not you rent - whatever you do or don’t do as personal responsibility practically does not matter unless you own a house.

    The small variations in rent price are also irrelevant, I used to pay more for less, in the grand scheme of things the variance only amounts to £100-200 per year and usually depends on how much you can tolerate free penicillin on the walls.

    The blame is only on boomers who hoard property, jack up rents and collect benefits from the gov’t off worker taxes. Virtually no one else is to blame apart from capitalism more generally.

    The same boomers will also soon elect the alt-right and things will get a lot worse and everywhere else seems to be on the same general trajectory.

    I used to dream of a utopia like Star Trek. Now 28 days later looks like a utopia.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I earn less than average (£26k), live in the south, most of my hobbies are cheap though. Fair bit of outdoor stuff - touching grass is free.

      The media really is pushing reform though, it’s crazy how much press they get. The party that wants to remove your human rights…

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m still recovering from the mistakes I made 8 years ago, for another 3 years maximum, so no savings,

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I don’t use my car much anymore, so would consider that liquid, and could make the kids pay some rent now they are working (not much), if I sold that and nothing in the house needed repaired or maintained (ha ha ha) I am at almost 3 years. So I guess if I had some fatal illness and was willing to run out all of both my &my husband’s retirement money I could stop working. Well, no, nevermind, I couldn’t, because the medical care would bankrupt us. But we would not immediately starve anymore. It only took half a century to get here!

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Without cutting back at all, even my frivolous spending and holidays, about six months.

    If i cut holidays and frivolous stuff, about twelve months.

    If i cut back essentials, sold some stuff, eighteen to twenty four months. If on top i downsized the house, probably five years.

    If i could make it to seven years then my private pension would kick in and I can retire. If the government hasn’t already moved the age you can draw a private pension i could be retired already.