If you have investments, let’s treat those as liquid cash for the sake of argument. Otherwise, the assumption is that you’re not selling property or possessions, but continuing to live as you do now.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just ran the numbers for the first time ever, and it adds up to 34 months - which I realize is a pretty privileged place to be. However, I’m by no means rich; I just live well below my means and invest all my savings.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I used to rent a single bedroom in an overcrowded house share, didn’t learn to drive because I couldn’t afford it.

        Had over a year of expenses saved, hardly makes you rich.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        Depends on who I compare myself to and how one defines “rich.” To me, it means someone whose passive income exceeds their spending - and I’m nowhere even close to that… yet.

        • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah I think that’s where the distinction between rich and wealthy comes in. You still have to work for a living and are closer to homelessness than renting out Venice for a wedding (for instance).

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          This exact question from this thread is how rich are you and 34 months is quite wealthy.

          It’s an important distinction where I’m a potential counter example. I admit it. I earn what ought to be a comfortable living but poor choices in the past (and probably still) mean that I’m only a couple months from financial disaster. And since it would affect my kids education and my old age, the affects would be major. I am clearly not wealthy, mostly due to my own choices

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Surely it depends how you live though. A guy spending just £15 a week on food and living in a tent is not wealthy just because they have £2k in the bank which will cover them for a few years.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              That’s a bit of an edge case but why not? If they earn enough to live the way they want, are secure from immediate financial catastrophe, and can afford some luxuries, then maybe they are wealthy, despite being subsistence

              Meanwhile someone can earn a nice fat six figure salary but be over mortgaged for house and car, not living comfortably, and paycheck to paycheck on the edge of financial disaster. They’re poor, despite it being by their poor choices

              Wealth is freedom from want and financial anxiety

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nearly everybody who speaks English is rich. We just have no clue who poor other parts of the world are and so think of ourselves as poor.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m in my mid 40’s.

      It’s not particularly uncommon for people in regional Australia to own their own house with no mortgage by my age.

      It’s pretty tough to find a family home that costs less than 10x average wage.

      So, as a kind of line in the sand I’d say maybe a third of 45 year olds living in regional Australia could “survive” for 10 years with no income.

          • Toaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago
            1. Open a Vanguard account.
            2. Buy as much of the thing called VOO as you can each month.
            3. Come back at retirement age to oodles of money.
          • TheOneCurly@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Mutual funds and ETFs are both types of investments that represent a group of individual stocks and are generally managed in some way, either by a person or by a fixed algorithm. Mutual funds have some tax implications that can by annoying for people so ETFs tend to be preferred for taxable accounts (in the US at least).

        • Mothra@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Thanks! Yes, I was wondering where would be a good place to start for absolute noobs, thanks for the tip. Investing is a mystery in my life I’ve been conditioned not to try to understand, perhaps it’s time to do something about it.

          • Nighed@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            It’s not too bad. The key thing if your in the UK is to open a stocks and shares ISA (similar to a cash ISA, but for stocks) that means you don’t have to worry about taxes.

            Other than that… Be aware that things are very volatile due to trump. He can say something and stocks drop 10% then recover by the end of the month… Or not.

            If you are in for the long term, the worst thing you can do is panic and sell when that happens.

          • mesa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Its pretty easy if you go with something like wealthfront, betterment, etc…

            But using something like fidelity is also good too.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Buy into a broad market tracking ETF (something that tracks s&P 500 or 1000 or similar). That way you’re not betting on individual companies, your betting on the collective largest companies in the world doing well. Over a long period of time, which for over a century has averaged ~7% inflation adjusted return yearly.