Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up1908
arrow-up1908imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square128fedilink
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-225 days ago`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images. I was thinking of “genus”.
minus-squareEthalis@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up17·26 days agoI think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-226 days ago“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·25 days agoDerp, that’s what I was thinking of.
minus-squareKrauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·26 days agoThey apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out Generated?
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·26 days agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-squarecelsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·26 days agoIt’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·26 days agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-225 days agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·25 days agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Genera?
Genre.
it’s very much ai,
generation?
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.I was thinking of “genus”.
I think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
Derp, that’s what I was thinking of.
They apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out
Yeah…no it isn’t.
Have, you lost Ted?
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
It’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.