Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up1908
arrow-up1908imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 26 days agomessage-square128fedilink
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-225 days agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·25 days agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.