• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You have to work with the information provided, not imagine further details. The info provided leans towards implying she stays at home.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Nope, it’s purely logic. I’m sorry you want this woman to work so bad. No one said you cannot imagine what you want, but that distinctly adds information that is not stated.

        • Distractor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It doesn’t state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn’t is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you?

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I am not insisting. I am declaring agnosticism. The evidence provided does not prove god her employment.

            Now please, start using logic instead of daydreaming.