

Immediately get wrecked by one of the many megafauna that would still be alive.
Immediately get wrecked by one of the many megafauna that would still be alive.
Especially the people who scream for multiple breaths. I cannot help but to think, “uhhh, has your simple mind not caught up to the situation, yet!?”. Ridiculous.
You’re making the mistake of assuming politicians represent the people in their district. They do not. They represent the monied interests lining their pockets.
Yes. Yes it is.
It’s not company time if it’s unpaid.
Nah, I wasn’t ignoring your fundamental points. I was discussing a tangent related to why you were being downvoted specifically. I find keeping to one topic at a time greatly increases someone’s chance of actually reading and understanding it.
I agree in the general case that up/down votes are far too coarse and uninformative, but sometimes it’s pretty obvious why someone’s getting an upset of votes.
Yes, that is called, “obstinance”. Or a lack of reading comprehension. Or both.
Perhaps a base drawing the AI and prompter are riffing off of, but this collage is so nonsensical and only gets worse the more you look at it. Most of it is either AI, or the artist has some very curious mental disorders.
No, you’re getting downvoted because you’re only responding to the parts of posts that you want to completely deny instead of engaging with other details.
Now, either continue to prove my point that you’re either bad faith or immature to the point of lacking self awareness, or respond to the other points made like how several ways to sort don’t even factor in votes like the default “active” or new comments, etc, or how some people actively seek out the controversial posts.
Obstinance should not be confused with confidance.
You’re definitely projecting your own opinion of the matter here. You’re not debating anything by simply repeatedly denying their view and restating your opinion.
Now please, if you want to actually discuss it, respond to their points about how many sorting schemes do not factor in votes. Respond to anything except the parts you simply want to deny.
You’re clearly getting engagement despite being downvoted, so this very discussion is proving your opinion ignorant and rather dogmatic.
You are appearing more and more bad faith, or just plain grossly ignorant, and willfully so… If you won’t accept the truth, the truth that is being handed to you, with references, by other people, then prepare to not be part of this “echo chamber” for much longer…
I’d much, much rather be in an echo chamber where BS is questioned and reality is not ignored than a conservative hellscape where basic facts of reality are ignored, like, “tons of CO2 in the atmosphere is totally fine, actually” or, “trans people are corrupting sports!”.
Yea… fuck those at best extremely stupid people and at worst, vitriolic piles of trash.
I had to give my friend this news some years ago, to no avail. Sooo many upvoted “answers” on Reddit are just confidantly incorrect BS. It’s also trivial to find reddit answers from general search results instead of limiting your search to just Reddit.
This ai generated crap does less than nothing to promote communism.
No, for the simple reason that some (yes, definitely not enough) politicians are trying to actually do good things, and they can do good things, in theory. Cops are bad because they’re enforcers of any and all laws, and nobody has purely good laws, and they’re specifically in the business of protecting property over lives, restricting peoples’ freedoms/etc.
The only case where all politicians are bad is in pure, actual communism, which cannot exist at this point in history.
You can declare what ever you want. It doesn’t make you correct.
I mean, if you view certain controlling mechanisms that are weilded by terrible people as mere extensions of the terrible people, then it may be worth revising how much bad people have harmed the world.
Also I wish I could be as optimistic as you about how few terrible people there are in the world.
The fact that dying is harder than a lot of people assume. Damn biology making me hungry and thirsty and afraid of train tracks…
Jellyfin and others transcode some videos to a more streamable format. Not important if it’s already a good streamable format, but if it’s some older file, it might not even be streamable (like AVI, and WMV). Those situations are where transcoding is necessary. It also comes in to play when the bitrate needs to change, like trying to watch a high bitrate video on old hardware that cannot handle it (like an old chromecast). It’s nice when the server can just transcode the video and send a less heavy or more compatible stream.
Hardware acceleration for the transcoding is simply more efficient these days. Most CPUs for the last decade can do software transcoding of 1080p without much issue (if that’s all it’s doing), but get multiple people watching older videos or some really high bitrate ones and hardware acceleration will become a tangible benefit, too.
Your situation only works for video formats that are streaming-friendly, meaning all the browser has to do is feed the stream of data to a video player, and it Just Works. The media player doesn’t need significant chunks of the file to start playing it, so as long as the connection is fast enough, it’s fine.