And somehow every single time the problem was so easy to solve, but apparently crying about it is the better solution.

    • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      TFM isn’t worth the R. It doesn’t describe failure states or bugs in a way that a normal user understands or can work with. Either it works perfectly, or there’s basically no way to figure out exactly what went wrong and how.

    • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The good old ways. I miss them.

      Nowadays, it’s more “User Manual? You mean the Manufacturer’s Opinion?”

      • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Sometimes I get confused with man pages and have to go on other sites with different explanations and examples. Maybe that’s just me

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No, that’s the state of documentation on Linux.

          In OpenBSD, bad or lacking documentation is treated as a release-critical bug in the package.