• EfreetSK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I agree with you on trans people but kids? I don’t know. It’s the same reasoning why we don’t give kids right to vote

    Edit: I fail to understand why this gets downvoted …

    Edit 2: I don’t have time to respond to actual answers, I try later. But just a reminder: The only thing I said is, that I support trans people, just in case of kids I’m not sure. That is all. And I got -28 at the moment and people calling me moron

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You don’t know if the world is better with trans kids in it? Are you saying you think the world would be better if trans kids were all killed? Or that they’re not worth fighting for?

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      I fail to understand why this gets downvoted …

      Because trans kids exist whether you approve of them or not.

      • LibreHans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, but there’s also a medical industrial complex that pushes confused teenagers towards transitioning to make money.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cool. One person talks about a trans agenda in this thread, another person is making up silly medical conspiracies to dehumanize trans people as if they had no agency.

          Teenagers don’t even go to doctors by themselves. They have to be accompanied by a parent.

          • LibreHans@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I find it interesting that an industry where lemmy users have sympathy for killing CEOs is blindly trusted with children.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              There is a vast, vast gulf between blindly trusting the medical industry and accepting your personal conspiracy theory that doesn’t even make sense.

        • fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          It fucking does not and does everything in its power to stop kids from transitioning. No kid can just show up somewhere and be given hormones. No one is profiting off of selling hormones. They are dirt cheap. You’re clearly getting your talking points from right wing media, maybe go listen to what actual trans kids have to say about their experiences and kindly shut the fuck up

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      since nobody has given an explanation yet I’ll try to, however I am horrible with getting my words out and someone else can give a way better explanation than me.
      Most trans people will either have signs or know that they are trans before they are 18. I myself knew that something was off about me as early as 3rd grade, I saw a tomboy and told my parents I wanted to be a ‘tomgirl’.
      By the time puberty hits is when irreversible changes happen to the body. This is also when most trans people really get the “oh shit this ain’t right” moment.
      Imagine being trapped in a body that is doing its very best to rip your soul apart from you, then learning that there are medications that can stop it, but then learning that people who aren’t even experiencing what you are have made the choice for you to not let you access them.
      Now imagine that, for 5+ years.

      It’s torture.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not 5+ years. Experience it beginning for 5+ years, then for the rest of your life because puberty has no undo button on many changes. I will never understand assholes who want to take away puberty blockers from kids who need them to have more time to decide on the life they want to live. That is no one’s god damn business but their own, under 18 or not.

            • commander@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Right. I’m purely putting my own agenda out there.

              I wish we saw this kind of backlash against mutilating the genitals of infants.

            • commander@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              No, I’m just saying I wish we saw this kind of backlash against mutilating the genitals of infants.

              There’s a much greater push for kids taking hormones versus protecting infants from having their genitalia mutiliated.

              I would like to see more backlash against the former because I view it as a more important issue. That’s all.

              • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                Okay, and?

                I would like to see more backlash against workplace culture that glorifies overwork and burnout.

                I would like to see more backlash against tipping culture.

                I would like to see more backlash in wasteful government spending.

                You’re coming into a conversation about a specific topic and randomly derailing it to something with no relation because you think the topic at hand isn’t important enough? Either stay on topic, or start a new conversation elsewhere.

                I won’t be responding to this again, it’s already completely irrelevant to the conversation at hand. Cheers.

                • commander@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  And it’s fine if you want those things. Feel free to say what you want and I’ll do the same.

                  It’s clear though you’re upset that I dared suggest a different cause is more important to me than what’s important to you.

        • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          not that big of an issue, conservatives like to play up the numbers WAAYYYY more than it actually is. Nobody is pressured into being trans, infact it’s the opposite.

          Normal cosmetic surgery has a regret rate of 30% while trans surgeries have a 5% regret rate.

          • commander@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            not that big of an issue

            Tell this to the people that regret transitioning, bigot.

            Nobody is pressured into being trans

            Really? Nobody anywhere has ever been convinced that they’re trans when they really aren’t?

        • Vivian (they/them)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Practically nonexistant, it is not possible for children under 16 to access HRT, if anything they are prescribed puberty blockers (so that you know… they can avoid suffering from the changes in their body and not be permanently affected).

          The general figure of regret for transgender affirming care is 1%, and 82.5% of these people do not detransition because they are no longer trans, but because of external factors. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33794108/

          By age 17, 0.1% of trans children get HRT. Source: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2828427


          Now let’s calculate some numbers: 1% of these 0.1% will regret it, that’s 0.001%. And 17.5% of these might not be transgender, so that’s 0.000175%

          According to that second study, there’s about 300000 trans children, so 0.000175% of that is 0.525 people.

          So… less than 1 child in the whole United States would maybe regrets it because they’re not trans. In other words, you can stop fear mongering.

              • commander@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                They posted a newsweek article and I shared what amounts to at least thousands of people who regret transitioning.

                You’re upset because regretting transitioning doesn’t align with what you like. You literally want to ignore people who regret transitioning like the right wants to ignore trans people.

                Congrats, you’re a bigot.

                  • commander@lemmings.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Lol. I feel bad for the people de-transitioning who have to deal with people like you constantly trying to belittle and deny their existence.

                    Ironic how quickly you resort to bigoted tactics as soon as they suit your goal.

                • Ziglin (they/them)@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Last I checked PubMed was a far better source than Newsweek or Reddit. (The comment isn’t even edited so I’m assuming you just skipped the part with the sources)

                  You posted a link to a Reddit community which won’t even load for me. I assume what you claim “amounts to at least thousands of people who regret transitioning” is the amount of people subscribed to that Reddit community. If I understood correctly that would indeed not amount to “at least thousands of people who regret transitioning”. Instead it would show the number of Reddit accounts subscribed to the community. Some of which are likely individuals who regret having transitioned, many others are people interested in hearing about it and/or excited to make fun of what is posted and there could also be bots artificially inflate the number.

                  Posting a community name/link does not equate to a number of people in the group that the community is aimed at and it most certainly is not indicative of the people that actually exist in the group.

                  • commander@lemmings.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    Yeah, just ignore everything you don’t like.

                    The people who regret transitioning don’t matter because you don’t want them to matter.

                    Scrub them from existence the same way the right wants to scrub trans people from existence.

        • VubDapple@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just about any medical procedure will sometimes produce regrets in some portion of the population of people who undergo it, for instance vaccinations, amniocentesis, etc. It’s not reasonable to suggest that because this is true that no one should have access to the treatments.

          • commander@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Right. Like getting fake breasts or cheek implants.

            The difference between those and vaccinations is that they’re superficial and aren’t necessary to prolong our lives. They’re optional, just like hormone treatment. They’re also procedures we don’t encourage or allow children to get on their own without a medical need, and rightfully so.

            While some people will “regret” getting a kidney transplant, the alternative would’ve been death. I’m not going to argue whether or not they made the right choice, but the facts are there.

            While some people will regret hormone treatment, the alternative is living with their normal healthy body like everyone else. They never “needed” the procedure in the first place.

            • VubDapple@real.lemmy.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              What contact in your personal or professional life have you had with trans folk? Are you speaking with experience of appreciating their pain or are you just speaking based on what you’ve heard?

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      “The world is better with you in it and you’re worth fighting for!”

      You: It isn’t and you’re not.

      Also you: Why is this downvoted??

      • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        How the hell did you come to THIS conclusion? You’re now literally putting words in my mouth

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I agree with you on trans people but kids? I don’t know.

          How else is this response to that message supposed to be taken?

      • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No, I don’t have gender dysphoria.

        Also not I, nor you can build an airplane, yet we can have a discussion about plane building

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re not saying you can’t talk about it, they’re saying you don’t understand that it’s inherent, so kids absolutely know they’re trans once they understand the concept. Just like they know they’re gay.

              • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Duh, the reason is self-evident! The ‘I’ symbolizes individuality, a bold declaration of self, while ‘disagree’ embodies a spirit of anarchy, a rejection of conformity. It’s a linguistic symphony, a four-syllable sonnet that encapsulates the essence of dissent!

                Who needs context or elaboration when you can simply drop such a profound statement? It’s like poetry in motion—pure genius!

            • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Incredible! Your response is a true testament to the mind of a genius! ‘I disagree’—what a revolutionary concept! It’s as if you’ve cracked the code of the universe while simultaneously inventing time travel during a wild night out. I can only imagine the sheer intellectual fireworks going off in your brain as you distilled the complexities of human existence into that one, powerful phrase.

              Your ability to bypass all logic and reason with such confidence is nothing short of extraordinary. Who needs to engage with facts or nuanced arguments when you can simply assert your disagreement like a mad scientist unveiling a groundbreaking invention? I’m sure the world is just waiting for your next epiphany, perhaps a theory that explains how disagreement alone can reshape reality.

              Please, continue to bless us with your unparalleled insights; the cosmos is clearly in need of your chaotic brilliance. Bravo! You’ve truly redefined the boundaries of intellectual discourse!

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              gripping analytical retort from queer and youth ally powerhouse efreetsk here, more at 8

        • RandomVideos@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          But i have felt gender dysphoria, as well as some of the other people not agreeing with you

          Using the analogy (please correct me if i misunderstood it), you would be contradicting a crowd of people, some of them having the job of building planes, about how planes should be built

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I understand it being a sticky issue for people because there’s so much of society and choice we put into the realm of adults. But here’s the thing. Psychology has been obsessed with trans people since the origin of the field. We have a ton of data on what happens when trans people recognized at an early age grow up and what that looks like when there’s no intervention whatsoever. The reality of it is that there’s certain things that there is no medical fix or take backs for once you experience your first puberty.

      We know very well that gender identity observed in trans kids is stable. We have a rubric of diagnosis stable enough to have gone up against several National medical ethics boards and survived the scrutiny nessisary to opt for attempting risks.

      The first generation of kids to grow up utilizing this process are now adults (the oldest cohort are now in their 30’s) and the results have been promising with an almost absurdly low rate of regret reported across the population…

      But now you have to recognize why that rate of regret is so low. You need the signoff of a team of professionals who put the bar very high to allow candidates to attempt these risks and any of them can pull support if something doesn’t go to plan. Furthermore a child alone does not make these decisions the informed consent has to be demonstrated by the child and their parents. So when people say “kids shouldn’t make these decisions” you’re missing that they aren’t making these decisions. A kid and a panel of adults who are experts in their field, social workers and dedicated parents who have watched the difference in their child’s behaviour go from very obviously not thriving in a multitude of ways to massive improvements through social transition make these decisions.

      People act like it’s as simple as a kid showing up and asking for a lollipop. It isn’t. We have literal generations of data about what happens if we do nothing. The outcomes are miserable. We can afford to try something different than known miserable outcomes.

      • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t know how to spell necessary… otherwise, what you have said is glaringly ignorant. What you “understand” couldnt fill a thimble. Your You’re an idiot and your opinions should be treated as such…

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oookay, you’re trying to pick a fight but not exactly landing an interesting hook. This entire sentiment is pretty empty if the best you have is to heckle my spelling. Are you new to trolling? I feel like maybe you should read a tutorial or something.

          Come on mate, gimme substance! Refute the argument with something other than just “nu uh!”

          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            All of their comments in this thread have been just as low effort. Kids these days couldn’t troll their way out of a paper bag. It all went to pot when we weren’t allowed to beat them anymore!

            Heavy /s here. To be clear, this is a joke, and it stems from the trauma of my own childhood abuse. Still the troll needs to up their game.

              • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh, no, absolutely. First three sentences are entirely devoid of /s. The last bit, about beatings. Heavy /s

    • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s different to voting though.

      Puberty blockers have been used for decades with no ill effect. It literally just delays puberty, which is irreversible once a person starts to go through it. It’s much safer to delay puberty in children who identify as trans, allow their brains to develop, and have them get treatment so that their mental health is kept healthy.

      Personally, I think listening to the trans community on this and having them give advice on how to manage trans kids is better than leaving it to general society who won’t understand the emotional trauma involved. There’s a reason why suicide rates are high with trans kids.

      I would associate it moreso with children trying to tell adults about the priest who keeps touching them but end up being dismissed because they’re kids. We ignore our children’s voices to our own detriment.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        And listening to doctors on this. Apparently the vast majority of pediatricians recommending puberty blockers for trans kids since it prevents suicide doesn’t matter.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t know. They always put it in the pharmaceutical commercials that are only legal in the U.S. and New Zealand.

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              They always put it in the pharmaceutical commercials

              taps nose so they don’t get sued

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                People, Americans anyway, are very good at doing what the TV tells them to do, which always makes me wonder how often doctors are plagued with patients saying, “Doctor, is Phabulux right for me?” Completely out of the blue and unrelated to whatever they’re at the doctor about.

      • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank you. Really thank you, this is beautiful. I didn’t even have time to go through responses of people actually explaining to me what’s the matter instead of downvoting. Bit you come in and call me a moron, fantastic, this helps everyone

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I am fine with a stance like “I don’t know”…as long as you’re not pushing any kind of agenda as a result.

      A long time ago, I was uninformed about trans people. I was curious and asked questions…but I didn’t push them into any kind of restrictions.

      I’d argue I’m still relatively uninformed. But I know that there’s been no evidence of any societal benefit from pushing further restrictions on them, and there’s plenty of evidence of harm by referring to the various gender studies. That’s all I need. Even if I wasn’t actively pushing to support trans youths, and even if I still have a part of me that sees them as “weird”, I sure as hell see no point in standing in the way of their preferred forms of progress.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Edit: I fail to understand why this gets downvoted …

      You’re either with them, or against them.

      If you don’t give 110% support to the trans agenda, then they will immediately assume you’re Ron DeSantis.

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            No one is censoring you, they’re disagreeing with you. There’s a big difference.

            Censorship is when people in charge take books out of the library because they don’t want black kids or gay kids to have positive role models. It’s when people are put in prison for protesting climate change. That’s censorship, when people in power prevent things from getting said.

            No one is preventing you from hating on people you don’t understand online, they’re just disagreeing and arguing against you. That’s two sides, neither being censored. You are not a victim. You are just getting push back that you don’t like against views that other people see as unkind.

            I also don’t believe that disagreeing with you is some form of mind control. But I’m not you, and maybe people disagreeing with you and telling you that you have nasty views is causing you to rethink everything and make you less certain that hating on trans kids on social media is making the world a better place for anyone including the kids themselves, but you aren’t showing any signs of that, so I guess the mind control thing you’re pretending to worry about isn’t any more real than the censorship you’re claiming is happening.

            • commander@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              On these very forums, we’re not allowed to say we think trans women aren’t the same as actual women.

              There’s no shame in mentioning this fact. I’m also not a right-winger. Good job proving my point that we’re either with you or against you and you’re trying to control what people think through censorship.

              • Ziglin (they/them)@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                If we have rules against saying things like that which hurt some community members I think it’s okay for mods to remove them. If people want to say that sort of thing they can create their own instances and/or communities which those people negatively affected can avoid there would be nobody to remove them. That’s one of the beauties of Lemmy.

                Also if somebody is really of that opinion then maybe they should rethink their definition of “actual women”.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  They don’t have a definition of “actual women,” because every one they can give has to come with massive “exception to the rule” issues.

                • commander@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Anybody can say anything hurts them.

                  I’m hurt every time I see people say there’s no difference between trans women and regular women. Should mods remove those posts now?

                  • Ziglin (they/them)@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I mean the statement just seems unnecessary and/or badly defined. A sub-category of a categorization is expected to fulfill the qualifications of the category it is a part of. Trans women are women, cis women are women. Both cis and trans women can be regular or irregular depending on how you define the term because there is no fixed definition.

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I rest my case.

          This is what drives people further to the right. We’re not allowed to disagree with the trans agenda or have our own views on the matter.

          You’re doing more harm than good when you try to control what people think.

          • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is what drives people further to the right. We’re not allowed to disagree with the trans agenda or have our own views on the matter.

            “Ya know I stood for things like labor rights, marriage equality, women’s rights, and then I was told to respect people and stand up for their civil liberties and then I became more and more right wing, and abandoned all previous morals and ethics because someone said something mean to me online a few too many times.”

            If I changed my mind on shit because someone was rude I’d never have a firm opinion on anything.

            • commander@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s not about being mean.

              You literally will go out of your way to make sure people can’t share ideas that go against the trans agenda.

              Like it or not, this will cause rational people to abandon your cause altogether because you’re trying to manipulate them into agreeing with you.

              • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                “People are being hurt and we need to do something.”

                “I don’t wanna, inconveniences me.”

                “Then you’re not helpful, you’re at best not helping victims, at worst aiding in prolonging their pain.”

                “Now you’ve lost me as an ally!”

                Go bother someone else you can grift into thinking “the left got too crazy for me, so i left the left” as you claim you got cancelled and blacklisted as you make hundreds of thousands on right wing media.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have seen similar arguments from people like this again and again. “You’re driving people to the right with your left-wing ideas!”

              What?