Thank you, that was very interesting. I was surprised at the definition of the basic open sets because they felt quite closed to my intuition, so the topology feels discrete to me. It’s definitely Hausdorff, I guess, but that’s no big deal. I’m guessing if you’re saying it uses a lot of the axioms, it uses the axiom of choice. It feels like that kind of arena, but I’m no set theorist. Having been taught by ring theorists, I always found the axiom of choice no big deal and totally uncontroversial, but I’m aware of the existence of mathematicians who feel otherwise, intuitionists (confusing name) and constructivists and the like. Do set theorists have a lot of debate about axioms, is it largely led by consensus, or deeply controversial, or just a case of making clear which you’re using and no one gets excited about it?

Let’s assume I can prove the countability and non countability of various famous sets and, for example, that (a^b)c = a^bc for cardinalities. What’s determinacy?

They called it 8.1

I had the exact same reaction.

So… the dead server controls who is even able to enter the building? Wow. That is one big juggernaut of a problem heading for you.

I was pointing out that reposts aren’t reposts for everyone and some new people enjoy old posts fresh.

Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope.

https://xkcd.com/1053/

I think the dare thing is consistent with the mismatched shoes.

Definitely a dare. Probably also drunk, yes. That or his boyfriend always likes to have easy access.

Very much so.

Acknowledged.

Pretty much every country has a mating season. It’s late autumn / early winter here in the UK. Birthdays all year round, but definitely peaking nine months after those long nights.

Thank you for answering the big questions for us all.

Vinnie Jones on meth.

I love this eye opening take. Thank you.

Go woke or go broke.

Nnnnno.

Seems to me that she understands that poor folks need food.

with someone who spends more money on the poor than on advertising?

Interesting way to phrase vote buying.

She could start at a local level and work her way up. Jumping to the top with no experience is how you get an ineffective politician who’s incapable.

Because becoming firmly entrenched in the traditional ways of the Democratic party, and running a traditional campaign, and waiting until there’s an incumbent to challenge before trying to get elected, and not actually helping poor folks with anything other than promises is the best way of winning and actually helping ordinary Americans?!

You claim to be left of most Americans but it doesn’t half make you butthurt that someone standing for elections helps poor people for real.

If the incumbent is retiring, is it so bad to replace the “uncorrupt representative” with someone who spends more money on the poor than on advertising?

Your objections seem really really weak. Loving nearby rather than inside, being kind to poor people instead of running ads, starting “too early”, using social media effectively to gain popularity, a bunch of apparently different redditors (that you claim are all secretly her) liking her work.

Were you or one of your friends hoping to stand or something? You seem to be accusing her of being suspicious because she’s doing things you think are unfairly popular.