• Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You have faith in your car based on the knowledge that it’ll get you to your destination

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        That’s a linguistic bait-and-switch. Your example has nothing to do with religious faith as a basis for conviction.

          • zqps@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            You’re not convincing anyone by misusing words.

            Here, let me demonstrate: I have hard evidence that God doesn’t exist. My evidence is faith.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              My evidence isn’t faith. My faith is based in historical fact.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Because a lot of people these days aren’t generally Christian.

                  • zqps@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 days ago

                    But if it’s rooted in historical fact, rather than cultural hegemony and parents passing on their belief systems to their children, then studying history would naturally lead people to become overwhelmingly Christian. Reality does not reflect that.