Furries are humanoid creatures with animal appearances and human or near human intelligence, they’re generally not considered zoophilic because they are mostly humanoid and can consent
I can’t tell if you’re joking, this is something I would say if I were trolling. Just in case you’re serious:
If they have human authors they are created with EXPLICIT consent. That’s how fiction works xD
That’s like condemning all fiction literature because the people in the stories were forced into horrible situations for the sake of the plot.
Isn’t that zoophilia?
Furries are humanoid creatures with animal appearances and human or near human intelligence, they’re generally not considered zoophilic because they are mostly humanoid and can consent
But furries cannot consent without being forced to by their human authors, therefore they cannot consent.
I can’t tell if you’re joking, this is something I would say if I were trolling. Just in case you’re serious: If they have human authors they are created with EXPLICIT consent. That’s how fiction works xD That’s like condemning all fiction literature because the people in the stories were forced into horrible situations for the sake of the plot.
That’s why all fiction is bad.
I am trolling at this point but I thought yiff was zoophilia