OneSpectra@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoWhat do you think antiauthoritarianism is?message-squaremessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareWhat do you think antiauthoritarianism is?OneSpectra@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square20linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremodernangel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe opposite of authoritarian extremism is probably libertarian extremism
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year ago“The opposite of drowning is asphyxiation” Nah man, it’s being able to breathe.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI mean, both are opposites in their own way.
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWell, yes, that’s my point, sort of. I’m pointing out that it’s never really black and white in that way, so his proposal of opposites isn’t really that good.
minus-squareOneSpectra@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWhich of those extremes does most of the population benefit the most from?
minus-squarewhotookkarl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIs it better to have no law or evil law? Most extremism have their own unique problems if they are exclusionary to pluralism.
The opposite of authoritarian extremism is probably libertarian extremism
“The opposite of drowning is asphyxiation”
Nah man, it’s being able to breathe.
I mean, both are opposites in their own way.
Well, yes, that’s my point, sort of. I’m pointing out that it’s never really black and white in that way, so his proposal of opposites isn’t really that good.
Which of those extremes does most of the population benefit the most from?
Is it better to have no law or evil law? Most extremism have their own unique problems if they are exclusionary to pluralism.