• BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This doesn’t get said enough. Piracy is only damaging if I would have paid to get the thing in the first place. If I’m pirating something that I would have avoided entirely had I needed to pay, literally no one is taking any losses.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t understand your logic. You deem piracy to be “not theft” if it’s so low quality that you would waste your time watching it for free.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If I’m pirating something that I would have avoided entirely had I needed to pay, literally no one is taking any losses.

          What does this statement mean then? Why would you pirate something if you had no interest in it? If it’s interesting enough to download, it must have been worth something to you.

          I think everyone here is just trying to justify piracy because it doesn’t meet some archaic definition of the word “theft”, when in reality, the definitions of counterfeiting and unauthorized access to intellectual property are 100% met.

          • slampisko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, but for me it’s just not worth the price that the official distribution channels are asking for it. If I didn’t have a free way to consume the content, I would skip it, and I wouldn’t lose anything by doing that. There is plenty of other content to consume, a lot of it legally for free.