downpunxx@fedia.io to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square201fedilinkarrow-up11.26K
arrow-up11.26Kimagegotdamnfedia.iodownpunxx@fedia.io to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square201fedilink
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 year agoWhen water touches water you get more water, not wet water
minus-squareBigBananaDealer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agothats because water is already wet 😂
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWater can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
minus-squareBigBananaDealer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.
minus-squareEleventhHour@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
When water touches water you get more water, not wet water
thats because water is already wet 😂
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
like water
Not at all
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy.
Fire is not a liquid.
i didnt say it was a liquid
Hence the fallacies.
Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.