• HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    If there were a “no genocide” candidate that could win, making that a single issue would matter.

    But voting is valuable even if your candidate doesn’t win. It’s about having your desires counted on the public record.

    If politicians see that they’re losing votes to anti-genocide third-party candidates, they’ll take notice.

    • pastabatman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s about having your desires counted on the public record.

      Get your desires on the public record in local and state elections and primaries where it might actually matter. For a US presidential election it’s an entirely empty gesture that makes you and only you feel better. No policies will change. No causes will be advanced. History will not remember you. It is very likely, however, that will make the lives of vulnerable people inside and outside of this country worse by giving trump a second term.

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        No policies will change. No causes will be advanced.

        Or, maybe politicians will see that they’re losing votes to anti-genocide third-party candidates, and their policies will change.

        And if not, then we don’t have a democracy anyway. If it’s not possible for the USA to cease its support for genocide, then this is not a liberal democracy, and this is certainly not the leader of the free world.

        What happened to “never again”? Never again is now and all I’m hearing is “eh, what can you do?”.