ideonek

Noted. Thank you.

I don’t see it. Bloodless raign? How am I suppose to misshear it?

No, that’s not it. Keep going.

deleted by creator

I have this vido on my “watch later” list since 2016 or so. I didn’t watch ir yet, but it seems to be about exactly this problem: https://youtu.be/h846qvlP26A

I don’t know man, from the sidelines it looks like you are banding over backwards to call a racist comment something other than “racist”.

Also, the financial outlook is all wrong.

It’s closer to the end. It’s very explicit. Michael is litearaly, like “I don’t know what the meaning of life is, but for me…”. You won’t miss it. And than you can let me know what episode exactly was it because I was meaning to revisit it and its hard to find :P

I feel like there was a radiolab or freakonomics episode about this exact problem. What am I thinking of?

Amazing.

I was being passive-agressive.

It seams like you may be well-fit for this type of envoirement.

My favorite quote of all time is from the web series PeopleWatching when on character compare the present to Star Trek saing “We have the ships, but not the crew”.

Reward for being even slightly competent and having work ethic is more work. To the point where you are doing everything until you break.

If you do something that needed to be done out of curtesy it’ll become your responsibility.

If you want to find someone who understand something about the corporation, look at the basement.

The best case for AI is that can heroicly solve problems that shouldn’t exist in a first place in a well-managed company.

It can structure unstructured data, that should be structured. It can do simple coding where aboslutly no coder could be reached. It can sum up the red tape and produce red tape to meet complience requirement that were where created for the sake of the red tape alone.

If the work is important, it shoudn’t be done by AI. If its busy work, it shouldn’t exist in a first place. No one would need AI to summarize anything if everything was writen clearly.

And thats best case scenario when you don’t count halucynations, errors, edge cases, company specyfic context - things that results in task taking more time after all the “oh it produced something and it looks good at a glance” cloud fall down.

If your company is getting a lot of value from AI than your company is trash.

No it fucking isn’t. While I agree (and hope) that it is most likely fake I’m fairly certain, that it was intended to to farm wholesomness and other warm feelings. If you laugh after reading this, you need to examine if you don’t have some empathy deficit disorder.

Edit: OK there is a “thankfully they both died” at the end that was not part of the original tweet, that I missed. I was wrong.

I hate this story. If this was true he performed medical procedure based on incorrectly obtained consent.

Someone providing thoughtulful, datailed and truly personalized answer to question that is to user-specyfic to generalize is one of few things I reality like about social media.

He Who Fights With Monsters litRPG adventure. Amazing book disguised as simple fun.

There is a theory about the meaning of life in this show that I found profound.