do you need an explanation beyond “some people online will believe anything”
do you need an explanation beyond “some people online will believe anything”
Couldn’t care less.
not my circus not my monkeys
One cool thing about piracy battles is ISPs’ interests are aligned with the pirates. It’s the record labels who are against it.
you can also have a free trial
eh, so they charge for it
FarraigePlaisteach
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeyx2I0UL9VNYC8X97SflUg
I’m interested in different perspectives so I’d like to avoid USA, GB etc.
Tá “comm” againn faoi sin: [email protected]
go get em tiger
knock em dead champ
etc
that’s beautiful
History doesn’t provide answers to hypotheticals
If you’re watching the things you want to watch, the “That’s not the right site so it doesn’t count!” argument doesn’t make much sense.
There’s no such thing as “fake” or “real” in this context.
This is not rocket science. You want to watch telly: you find the site, hit play, it plays.
Nah, search for ‘aniwave’ and you can find it easily
Hahahaha
Imagine believing a website is down because a paper says so.
Takes five seconds to find.
the proof of the pudding is in the eating
MPA says no more “Whac-a-Mole” with pirate sites
Why would you say something you know you’ll regret having said?
The writing system has its flaws too.
Some of these might sound like non-issues to grown-ups, but they’re hard for children.
No human society in any climate has ever been nocturnal: https://web.archive.org/web/20030318032208/http://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm