Nah it was a big thing.

It really does take a village and we need to get back into living with big extended families.

0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1A, 1B, 20, 21, …, A0, A1, A3, …

You can use your hands to count in base 12 if you want to, and some cultures have done so. Just use the segments on your fingers on one hand, using your thumb to count each segment.

https://youtube.com/shorts/ThOuUa_iLnM

Target shooting or trap and skeet.

Well but they aren’t roots, they’re from a stem that goes back under.

I come just imagine sometime reading too much into it, that’s all… It’s the internet.

My parents installed “Net Nanny” to keep me from watching porn or spending too much time on the internet as a middle-schooler. (Trust me, they’re good and accepting parents.) Anyway, I figured out that all you had to do was not click “okay” on the startup-induced message window and Net Nanny never started the controls or timer.

That’s really the crux of this stupid argument. Is a neural network that analyzes x-rays before handing them to a doctor AI? I would say no. At this point, AI means “over hyped LLM and other generalist models.” But the person trying to judge others over AI would say yes.

Fucking love my Framework 16 and I’ll tell everyone every chance I get.

No, only 13% have the kind that specializes in your genitals. Where they have it and the other kind is not a part of the static. (However it’s pretty likely the numbers sort of self-balance and it ends up that about 13% of people have one of the herpes virus on/near their junk.)

Both kinds can infect anywhere on the body, they just each have a zonal preference.

I mean, it infects your nerve cells. That’s a tricky place for medicine for obvious reasons.

Maybe you could categorize it under poor impulse control and poor understanding of social norms. But like, one incident doesn’t make a diagnosis.

https://youtu.be/me60gWzbMXw

Stun guns are useless.

Strategic voting can be an optional strategy under ordinary approval voting. If I don’t like either of the top two candidates, it’s still in my best interest to vote for the runner-up, if I hate them less than I hate the front-runner.

And look man, I’m honestly not interested in picking over the details. Any proportional system is better than single-winner. By miles.

Okay, actually though? Keep the mustache, drop the beard, and cut weight (fix your diet) and you would be killer. You look great now, but I can see an even hotter version of you in your future with just a little hard work.

1. While this complaint is technically true for SPAV, the likelihood that a popular candidate would fail to win a seat because everyone thought they were too popular is just… Not gonna happen. We already know from real-world AV elections that voters largely prefer to vote honestly, there’s no reason to think they would get more strategic when it gets harder to figure out the optimal strategy.

2. This is a problem inherit to nearly all systems designed to produce proportional results. I honestly can’t think of a worthwhile system that doesn’t have this problem. Anyway, the goal is not to make the parties take turns. It’s to make it possible for minor parties to win seats in the legislature. In the end, no single party would ever have a controlling majority, and they would be forced to form coalitions to pass legislation.

Hey! You come back here with that irrelevant commentary!

You’re going to have to get more specific if you want a response beyond “yeah man, it is 250 years old.”

He certainly wasn’t horrified about doing it in the original myth, as far as I remember.