sealioning ?

many people here recognize a pattern in the shape of the teeths and this pattern is this :

it seems absurd to me to suppose that everyone should know about these stupid cultural markers.

community over at piefed called c/wnc
and
lemmy.world c/wnc community
are separate.

Also, at LW, the PieFed one shows as :
lemmy(dot)world/c/wnc@piefed

garbage account // garbage post ?

i would be happy to give you, kid, Archimedes, a place to stand, so to put things in motion

thanks, Today i learned :
Shitpost ~= (Jokes, Banter, etc …)

Sidebar :
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter.

Almost ;
it’s a parody, a caricature. Made in reaction to what you explained.

it could be this one or another bug :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Xestobium_sound.ogg

Friday the 13th 😯

Maybe you are right about the origin of fuck. Yet, I do believe language tend to be modified over time in the way I (tried to) described above.

You have to understand the impact of euphemism, hypocrisy and modesty to language.

Example : at one point it was seen as obscene to talk about copulation, coit and fornication. So, for the houses where the king approved fornication, they simply created a modest acronym F.U.C.K. (short for : Fornication Under King’s Consent) that later became itself seen as (of course) obscene.
Similarly at one point, long ago in history, it was seen as rude to tell a guard// servant// soldier to kill someone else and the euphemism chosen at the time was to say “execute” meaning “carry on” without saying what was to be carried on.
This word “execution” is being increasingly seen with that later “capital punishment” meaning … this might be telling something of our preoccupations and/or obsessions.

i made about 100,000↑& many↓ in here … your site says i made :
30↑ & 0 ↓on posts
19 ↑ & 1↓on comments …

… i know this information is somehow public but maybe not so easily

@naught101
maybe i should explain a bit more what i meant. On the one hand there will be our capacity of distinguishing between what is and what is not the same. On the other hand there will be what is truly indistinguishable, weather we can see it or not (or whether any sophisticated system/being could differentiate it or not). Still, a sentient being will ultimately have some responses that will be different from a non sentient being … in my opinion.

the part of emotion’s phenomenas that we can’t feel (not a signal or signals) is of lesser interest to me.

i agree with your statement and because of this trap i chose not to really answer op’s question

there is nothing more or nothing magical in carbon atoms that makes them superior when it comes to relaying/processing/genarating signals.

“When”, but that could be 1,000 years from now or maybe only 10 … but then, when this truly happens, those system will have become sentient.
So, at that point, when that happens, then yes, there truly won’t be any difference.

see comment by user “Sterile_Technique” above (same idea but better developed)

see comment by user “Sterile_Technique” above (same idea but better developed)

i’m glad you wrote it before i did : your take is much more detailed and thaurough than mine on this idea.