SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 days agomonthly challengesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square110linkfedilinkarrow-up1706
arrow-up1706imagemonthly challengesopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 8 days agomessage-square110linkfedilink
minus-squarena_th_an@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up78·8 days agoIf you read it aloud it doesn’t sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it’s saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?
minus-squaremoseschrute@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-26 days ago500 > steps_per_day Unfortunately I don’t think we have enough information to solve for steps_per_day , though I assume it is also >= 0 . So we can make an educated guess that 500 > steps_per_day >= 0
minus-squareElectricd@lemmybefree.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-26 days agoThat’s if you interpret the text as being part of the equation
minus-squareBackgrndNoize@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up46·edit-28 days agoYes that’s the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as ateps/day < 500
minus-squareCapricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·8 days agoIt’s so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again. Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.
minus-squareVioletSoftness@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·8 days agoPeople don’t know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·8 days agoCan’t tell if an Excel enthusiast or a palindrome aficionado. 🤔
If you read it aloud it doesn’t sound right, but from a mathematical perspective it’s saying the number of steps per day should be less than 500, which I think is the intention of the writer, no?
500 greater then steps per day
500 > steps_per_dayUnfortunately I don’t think we have enough information to solve for
steps_per_day, though I assume it is also>= 0.So we can make an educated guess that
500 > steps_per_day >= 0Lmao
That’s if you interpret the text as being part of the equation
Yes that’s the intention but they got the order wrong, it would make more sense if it was written as ateps/day < 500
It’s so wrong it underflowed into somehow being right again.
Unusual? Sure. Mathematically? Right.
People don’t know how to use greater-than or less-than symbols
x>5 <=> 5>x 🤓
Can’t tell if an Excel enthusiast or a palindrome aficionado. 🤔
Yes