Everyone likes to believe they’re thinking independently. That they’ve arrived at their beliefs through logic, self-honesty, and some kind of epistemic discipline. But here’s the problem - that belief itself is suspiciously comforting. So how can you tell it’s true?

What if your worldview just happens to align neatly with your temperament, your social environment, or whatever gives you emotional relief? What if your reasoning is just post-hoc justification for instincts you already wanted to follow? That’s what scares me - not being wrong, but being convinced I’m right for reasons that are more about mood than method.

It reminds me of how people think they’d intervene in a violent situation - noble in theory, but until it happens, it’s all just talk. So I’m asking: what’s your actual evidence that you think the way you think you do? Not in terms of the content of your beliefs, but the process behind them. What makes you confident you’re reasoning - not just rationalizing?

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    What if your reasoning is just post-hoc justification

    Relax, part of it is :)

    The brain is able to do many different kinds of thinking. Reasoning is one of them. Dreaming is another, etc.

    When you are thinking logically, then it is reproducible, and it is understandable and verifiable by other people.

    When you do scientific research, such verfification by others is even required, before your results are considered meaningful and true.