(As a general concept of how a society should run, not intended as a US-specific question.)

I sometimes see people on the internet saying that giving people easy access to guns is too risky and there should be stricter gun control, while simultaneously wanting to abolish the police? I’m just confused on what people really want?

You cant both abolish the police and then also disarm the citizens, gotta pick one. So which is it, internet? Self-policing with guns? Or reform the police?

[Please state what country you’re in]

---

(Also its funny how the far-right of the US is both pro-gun and pro-police, I’m confused by that as well)

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Bows/crossbows should be restricted to use in special clubs, just like guns or rifles, where they are stored on premise.

    Restricting slingshots would be hard to enforce, but I’d say carrying them in public should be just as illegal as carrying guns.

    Tbh I’ve never seen a use case that requires ownership of a slingshot, other than maybe feeding fishes in preparation of a long cast.