ElCanut@jlai.lu to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 years agoPlease Stopjlai.luimagemessage-square416linkfedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down11
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1imagePlease Stopjlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 years agomessage-square416linkfedilink
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.cadeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 years agoThere aren’t a lot of distributed databases with no single owner and all writes are signed.
minus-squarekameecoding@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·3 years agoYeah, but not having an owner is actually a fucking terrible thing for a banking system, how do you not grasp this?
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 years agoNo owner is great for a banking system. It stops the owner printing money whenever they feel like it.
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.cadeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoI do grasp it. I don’t really know what situation it makes sense for. It seems like a tool for cases where nobody can agree who should own the records of something so now everyone should.
There aren’t a lot of distributed databases with no single owner and all writes are signed.
Yeah, but not having an owner is actually a fucking terrible thing for a banking system, how do you not grasp this?
No owner is great for a banking system. It stops the owner printing money whenever they feel like it.
Bruh
I do grasp it.
I don’t really know what situation it makes sense for. It seems like a tool for cases where nobody can agree who should own the records of something so now everyone should.