I found myself chatting with my dad and brought up the topic. I couldn’t come up with any actual advantages a federated platforms had. The main reason I use any federated platforms is because they’re either not as enshittified as the alternatives or run by huge dickwads. Since it mostly fits those criteria, I’m on Bluesky too, but once that goes I’ll either switch to another un-shittified platform or Mastodon.

But on its own, what advantage does a federated social media have?

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is no single point of failure.

    If one instance goes down they don’t take the whole thing with it. If one instance gets taken over by corporate interests, it does not take all the other instances with it.

    If a community on sweatyballs.social is dogshit, someone can create the same named community on poopfed.io as a replacement. The site administrator of sweatyballs.social can’t do anything about that.

    This can also be a negative to some degree, but being able to block and defederate allow for mitigating those risks.