Kairos@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agotop 5 unsolved problems in computer sciencelemmy.todayimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1362file-text
arrow-up1362imagetop 5 unsolved problems in computer sciencelemmy.todayKairos@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square62fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretatterdemalion@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·4 days ago Yes I hate this so much. Use a better window manager. Use a better web stack. Don’t most browsers support this? https://wormhole.app/
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-23 days agoI love it so much when reddit lemmy clients think they are smarter and they renumber points 5 to 1 as 5 to 9… edit: oops, still sometimes writing reddit instead of lemmy after almost 2 years…
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoIt’s not the client, it’s markup.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agothis is not a defined thing in markdown, just the markdown renderers of some clients do it
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoThis here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list Ordered lists use numbers followed by periods: Bird McHale Parish It’s important to note that the actual numbers you use to mark the list have no effect on the HTML output Markdown produces. The > HTML Markdown produces from the above list is: <ol> <li>Bird</li> <li>McHale</li> <li>Parish</li> </ol> If you instead wrote the list in Markdown like this: Bird McHale Parish or even: Bird McHale Parish you’d get the exact same HTML output
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agohmm, you are right. it’s not actually a bug in the renderer then
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 days agoThe only difference to the standard that I see is that the standard says it should be 1,2,3,4,5, while at least for me it renders as 5,6,7,8,9. But that’s probably because it doesn’t render as HTML and thus doesn’t rely on HTML to do the numbering.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days ago Don’t most browsers support this? but not all web servers. often it’s disabled
minus-squaretatterdemalion@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoOof, that’s unfortunate. I can’t say I’ve run into this problem though.
I love it so much when
redditlemmy clients think they are smarter and they renumber points 5 to 1 as 5 to 9…edit: oops, still sometimes writing reddit instead of lemmy after almost 2 years…
It’s not the client, it’s markup.
this is not a defined thing in markdown, just the markdown renderers of some clients do it
This here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list
hmm, you are right. it’s not actually a bug in the renderer then
The only difference to the standard that I see is that the standard says it should be 1,2,3,4,5, while at least for me it renders as 5,6,7,8,9.
But that’s probably because it doesn’t render as HTML and thus doesn’t rely on HTML to do the numbering.
but not all web servers. often it’s disabled
Oof, that’s unfortunate. I can’t say I’ve run into this problem though.