I am worried that there is not really a benefit of doing that, just more noise and energy consumption.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know that this would be the most secure way. But I seriously doubt that this level is necessary in a normal home network.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Necessary” is a little ambiguous. You could argue that wifi is unnecessary for a normal home network.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, I think it is necessary if you have mobile devices. Anything nailed down should be connected by wire, but if it is mobile, it should get the connection. Especially if the cell phone link is not that good inside the house.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          None of my mobile devices are “necessary,” though. Honestly, I could live just fine without an internet connection. Not that I’d enjoy it, but that’s not necessary.

    • BritishJ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      My solution is the correct way and easier way. You don’t need MAC address white-list. You just have a guest SSID with DHCP on, they get the IP from the subnet in that zone. No crazy subnet hacks etc.

      Can I join your guest network, sure. Let me just grab your mac address, login to the DHCP server, create a reservation with a limited subnet mask that can still see the default gateway.

      Or can I connect to you guest network, sure here is the code or scan that QR code. That’s it, they’re in the guest VLAN and subnet, zoned off on the firewall and have QOS applied to not saturate the network.