Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1969
arrow-up1969imageAt least Quark had some integrity.lemmy.worldPharmacokinetics@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square121fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoMaybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”. Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
minus-squarebrbposting@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoImmediate scenario that came to mind here is The client demanded any other public defender, as long as they weren’t black or female.
Maybe from an equity perspective, but not from a lawyer perspective. So you’d probably say “we need more women in law”.
Because the topic is women. If the topic was lawyering, then sex won’t come up.
Immediate scenario that came to mind here is