cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1765cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1765imageJunior Prompt Engineeringlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareheavydust@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 month agoBut it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
minus-squarepeoplebeproblems@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·1 month agoThat’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up23·1 month agoHow to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
minus-squaremaiskanzler@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 month agoPeople could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 month agoWe don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.
But it would need to be reliable with a syntax, like some kind of grammar.
That’s great, but then how do we know that the grammar matches what we want to do - with some sort of test?
How to we know what to test? Maybe with some kind of specification?
People could give things a name and write down what type of thing it is.
A codegrammar?
We don’t want anything amateur. It has to be a professional codegrammar.