cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoOh well...lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.17K
arrow-up11.17Kexternal-linkOh well...lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoAny time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoJust because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoNot telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.
Any time someone is terminated without cause, the employer simply doesn’t provide a reason for termination. They’re not required to.
Just because they don’t give the reason doesn’t mean the reason can’t be proven.
Not telling someone why you are firing them isn’t a magical lawsuit avoidance option. In a wrongful termination lawsuit, the courts take context into account specifically because of shitty companies/managers trying to hide behind exactly that.