superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agoThat explains it.feddit.orgexternal-linkmessage-square237linkfedilinkarrow-up11.62Karrow-down11
arrow-up11.61Karrow-down1external-linkThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square237linkfedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up158·2 years agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up42·2 years agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 years agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)