lawrence@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 years agoClimate Summitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square123linkfedilinkarrow-up11.96Karrow-down11
arrow-up11.96Karrow-down1imageClimate Summitlemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 years agomessage-square123linkfedilink
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·3 years agoIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 years agoThe reason would be to not cost so much…
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·3 years agoIt would cost far more to not address the issue.
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 years agoBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoNo, it’s making fun of that assumption.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 years agoSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 years agoI do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 years agoWhat conversation are we having?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nldeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agodeleted by creator
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
The reason would be to not cost so much…
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
Exactly.
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
I do but that’s not the conversation we’re having.
What conversation are we having?
deleted by creator