ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 天前Uncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square226linkfedilinkarrow-up1550arrow-down112
arrow-up1538arrow-down1imageUncle Bob becoming even worse:lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 天前message-square226linkfedilink
minus-squaresirdorius@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·21 天前Isn’t this just the natural evolution of TDD? Write tests, pass them, don’t care about how garbage the code is to make them pass
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·21 天前But if the ai writes the tests and you don’t read them, how would you know if that’s 100 lines of assertTrue(true) ?
minus-squareDisasterTransport@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·21 天前If it’s stupid but it works it’s still stupid and you’re lucky
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·21 天前And, if you deploy/share it, you’re both lucky and stupid. ☝🏼 Well, the luck’ll invariably run out on that path, but the stupid certainly seems tenacious.
minus-squarebjaress@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·21 天前So, “red, green, refactor” has become “red, green, deploy”? That’s a change, for sure, but I wouldn’t call it an evolution.
Isn’t this just the natural evolution of TDD? Write tests, pass them, don’t care about how garbage the code is to make them pass
But if the ai writes the tests and you don’t read them, how would you know if that’s 100 lines of assertTrue(true) ?
deleted by creator
If it’s stupid but it works it’s still stupid and you’re lucky
And, if you deploy/share it, you’re both lucky and stupid. ☝🏼
Well, the luck’ll invariably run out on that path, but the stupid certainly seems tenacious.
So, “red, green, refactor” has become “red, green, deploy”?
That’s a change, for sure, but I wouldn’t call it an evolution.