Don’t Google hold the keys to the kingdom on that one? I see it as unlikely that Signal adds support.
Hi you’re reading content by a non-AI person, 100% humane or at least furry.
Sometimes my posts are licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Feel free to contact me for an alternative licensing deal.
Don’t Google hold the keys to the kingdom on that one? I see it as unlikely that Signal adds support.
They do stand up for themselves. Meaning, their bottom line.
I’ve never said Telegram is better. I’m just saying Matrix is also bad.
XMPP is the future.
Isn’t matrix like an absolute non for privacy?
But the right solution is inconstitutional and anti-corporate! Even socialist and maybe even “woke”! So, this is the option TPTB are leaving us with.
Don’t like it? The second most useful thing to do compared to this is to ready your guillotine. That is the language they understand.
Oh yeah that should be cheap considering Cuba is right around the corner, for example.
I plan to keep using my current 2015-ish phone to watch my media at home, so it’s likely I’ll keep off of AV1 until phones are made somehow hardware upgradable (Fairphone?). Plus, in a general sense, in order to reacquire new media in a better codec you have to at least keep the old media around until you have finished verifying the new, otherwise you run the risk of ending up with no good copy.
Sounds sus.
I won’t dispute that both of these likely abuse the subscription model for their benefit. But they definitely have a social responsibility (and in many cases a legal responsibility) to keep updating the software in these products and the network infrastructure that go with them.
I mean, it would be zero cost if it was a fucking normal device. Someone had the idea that a juice squeezer or a toaster should be online… for… what, exactly? Remove the online (or even better, remove the software), you completely remove the cost that you want impugn on the user with “subscriptions”.
Simple:
Suffices for Putin, doesn’t it?
But yeah no, really, the solution is vodka
AYO how is that legal?
This. With digital feudalism now crossing into the physical realm this way, it’d be nice to see people finally sharpening their guillotines.
“It shall be done, my Lord.”
Considering Presidents and CEOs exist, I don’t think they’d be bad. You might even get out on a golden parachute.
Even the cat looks like he could olympically casually shoot at you.
Like “Usonian”, not like “USonian”, I’d guess? Flat U, non-“yoo”-ed; stress on the O; the “nian” more or less like “nyan” but 'murrically less cute.
But there’s not really another good demonym that’s not an slur. “Estadosunidenses” is too much of a mouthful and “Statesman” has another meaning.
Usonian?
or Germany. And I only identify the latter as such, because of…
…ich_iel?
I’ll give you one (1) pity point for jumping right to the low hanging tree category for personal attack.
It’s a licensing statement. Their post is CC-licensed.