

I am sure food company, dietitians, nutritionists, and companys that offer weight management products will beg to differ.


I am sure food company, dietitians, nutritionists, and companys that offer weight management products will beg to differ.


I would be really cautious in giving any biometric data to OpenAI.


LLM is very good at programming when there are huge number of guardrails against them. For example, exploit testing is a great usecase because getting a shell is getting a shell.
They kind of acts as a smarter version of infinite monkey that can try and iterate much more efficiently than human does.
On the other hand, in tasks that requires creativity, architecture, and projects without guard rail, they tend to do a terrible job, and often yielding solution that is more convoluted than it needs to be or just plain old incorrect.
I find it is yet another replacement for “pure labor”, where the most unintelligent part of programming, i.e. writing the code, is automated away. While I will still write code from scratch when I am trying to learn, I likely will be able automate some code writing, if I know exactly how to implement it in my head, and I also have access to plenty of testing to gaurentee correctness.


Usually, I spend $40 in a buffet, annihilate all their snowcrabs, then spend an hour next day on to toilet until my leg is so numb that I can barely stand.
Do I care? No, because I have made it: I make more than minimum wage now.


Do we know who is that person?
BTW, video also said many are injured, besides “at least” one death.
Sorry, quiet. Fixed in the original comment.
I use 30–40 searches per day, and I almost never need to bang to google. When I do bang to google, I consistently find worse result.
It is indeed expensive compare to most of the other donations/subscription I have, but there is really no alternative to this experience.
I use nebula, lemmy, mastodon, kagi, jellyfin, signal, thunderbird, fedora, tutanota, and so on. My weekly subscription/donation bill is probably around $50, which is just the price of 2 LLM subscription, so honestly, not that much considering how expensive everything is nowadays. But, oh boy, let me tell you, my digital world is quiet: there is nothing in my face pushing AI or ads, and I get every update I need, and can just use my tools and gets things done. All of them cost money/donation, but I would rather spend money to save time and my mental health now…


I see you don’t run electron app in flatpaks :)


That is not the case, exam evaluates learning outcome. If the student satisfies the learning outcome in the end, I don’t care how they did it.
I am only here to help the student acheive as much as they can, then assigning a score that reflects their achievements.
That is the important part: it is only a letter, but I would like that letter should reflect skills, instead of total time spent, or how they choose to learn and allocate their time. I don’t want student to waste their precious time when they can achieve the required outcome without doing homework and/or attending classes.


But on the third hand,
I know an AI comment when I see one /jk


Seems like this one still exists https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/1922


The good side: I feel it might enables me to better setup parental control in the future. If software read from the age field, then the blocking can be more robust than a simple DNS sink hole by pihole, which is really easy to get around, with mobile data or directly visiting IP address.
I do find this field is fundamentally different from verification using government issued ID (yet). I will definitely fight the next one, but I am kind of okay with this one.
Cons: it is additional fingerprint parameter, I hope the xdg-desktop protocol can be implemented to give out as little information as possible for the age field, instead of just handing the birthday field to every app that ask for it. And I hope all adult who don’t have any age-based content filtering needs will opt to leave the field empty.


I think the law in Brazil have already come into effect at the time of the merge. So it is not really compliance in advance.


I personally feel it is exactly the sprit of community is designed for, no? This community explicitly welcome potentially stupid question in the hope that good discussions can arise from it.
I agree that this question is indeed werid and perhaps even deserves to be called “stupid question”, but I feel this is what this community is welcoming, no?


Sorry, but why? Are they breaking any rules?


poorer people generally tend to be less attractive than rich people due to lack of access to cosmetic care.
Sorry, but why is every single rich old person I see on TV literally looks like goul. .


Unlike fern and tldrnews, I don’t think they declared no AI, but I feel most of there animation seems to involve a lot of human labors, at least on top of AI.
They have also never declared the use of AI either, so I guess I don’t know for sure.


Veritasium
Fren
Johnny Harris
Compterphile
3blue1brown
tldrNews (several channel each for different region)
RealLifeLore
Money and Macro (actual economist, not finance bro)


It is optional field and can be unset and set to arbitrary value by the administrator. If you can build your own OS, isn’t it easier to just unset this value?
I am sorry but the very picture about wondering whether things are AI or not looks terribly like AI…