Your neighbors would be lucky to have a house if it actually went off.

There’s a lot of reasonableness and average person would expect in law, but needing a supersonic bullet to hit it is well out of reasonable territory.

Would this count as a trap? You could probably argue needing someone to fire a supersonic round into it makes it not a trap.

I see said the blind man, as he picked up the hammer and saw.

Outside the post WWII bubble most new construction is always luxury focused. The old luxury becomes the entry and mid level places.

Lego is the best of the blocks/bricks. Nothing else is close in quality.

It’s steam, like almost all power obviously.

Kid Rock is the guy you call when everyone else said no and you can only pay in Bush Light.

Yea, but that still was a funny episode as their beliefs were played as a joke. There’s not anything funny about sex trafficking and ritual killing.

They need an episode with a disclaimer the whole time that this actually happened. It wouldn’t be a fun episode though.

Yep. You can’t outrun your fork.

I think we need more of everything else (except Linux and Star Trek) rather than less politics.

In the sense that the US is a product of British colonialism then yes. Global communication wasn’t anywhere near robust until the empire was in decline.

Every major infrastructure project that involves tunneling or digging runs into massive cost overruns, so basing the number on a cost estimate is already fishy. 100x is probably overkill, but not absurdly so. US infrastructure averages 8-12x more than elsewhere in the world, and it’s getting worse. New York adding less than two miles of track to their subway still cost more than double the estimate. California is spending infinite money on a rail line that may never exist.

Would you rather spend $100 for a 5% chance of losing power for 4-8 hours per year, or spend $10,000 dollars for a .1% chance of losing power for a minimum of 2 days?

I think it should require some proof that there was mutual intent to prevent or end a pregnancy, but otherwise it seems reasonable.

There are anti-slapp laws to help with this, but they aren’t always used appropriately.

That’s not actually a solid defense as “fictional” characters that are obviously someone that exists can still be ruled libel. A common informal defense is to give the fictional person a small penis. It doesn’t change anything legally, but it does require someone suing you to admit in court that they have a small penis.

Department of feeding and testing kids.

Valerian and the city of a thousand planets. It’s an amazing setting and if you put some leads with actual chemistry in a sequel it could do well.