Anyone who gets surprised when they find out someone has never been skiing.

That depends on culture a lot. In Austria it’s actually rare to find someone who has never been skiing (25% of the population go skiing regularly, and that has already been at around 50% not many years ago). Even when not doing it with your family while growing up everyone learns it at school.

I’m not rich at all but I do get surprised when someone who isn’t obviously from another country has never been skiing (typically it means that they grew up somewhere else but you just don’t notice anymore).

Faith in humanity restored

I meant it’s shrinking without immigration, yes. As more and more countries are developed, less and less countries have population growth, so there’s also no population growth through immigration anymore (when one time the people from the few countries that still have population growth are distributed among so many countries without population growth).

It is solving itself if we keep working on helping countries to become developed.

Population is shrinking in developed countries, looks like that issue will erase itself as more and more countries are developed.

As someone without children:

They should, yes. Children are extremely important for our future so especially people who earn well and can provide their children with a good life (likely leading to a successful carrier later on) should be encouraged to have them.

Additionally this kind of culture is needed if we want women to have same chances as men (since childcare still is majorly done by women, and likely always will be (progressive families split it evenly, conservative families don’t or at least don’t split it evenly, for every family where the father does more there’s at least one where the mother does more))

On mander.xyz certainly not

That’s what I expect when it gets labelled as Germany

Falsches s, 7/10

Do you think killing for example Hitler would’ve changed anything? He just was some random guy who joined an already existing movement (and even without that movement ww2 was inevitable after the peace treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain). They’d just have picked someone else to lead it

Do you think killing Putin would change anything? He put complete loyalists everywhere, if he’s gone his political line will continue.

These are systematical issues, you can’t fix them as long as a large majority of those who have power to change anything (in a democracy thankfully that’s everyone who’s eligible for voting) simply accept it.

Side note: In the USA’s recent election ~32% voted for the Republicans and ~32% for the Democrats while over a third just didn’t care at all. That’s not how you get something to change in a democracy!

If it’s well-made: Glundner. In grocery stores it isn’t outstanding but some farmers have perfectioned it.

Oh it’s a term linked to that industry…

But I suppose average people will not know of that meaning, so it’s a perfectly fine brand name (I also still don’t know what it means but know enough to know that I don’t want to know it)

What’s wrong with this?