If someone “perceives they are losing out” because of doing something positive for women or minorities then that says a lot about their worldview, they are the ones responsible for polarisation there.
Agreed on the campaign though, it was the dems’ to lose and they royally fucked it up.
Yeah, the demographics of voters are just made up, huh? They are the overwhelming supporters of the far right. Don’t wanna be painted like that? Don’t vote for fascists.
I’m a cis white guy too, for the record, and I’m not saying it’s something inherent in skin colour or having a penis that makes someone an asshole. But it’s classic bully behaviour to tell people lower on the hierarchy “look what you made me do”. You want things to be less divided then you should start by accepting the simple facts.
No, straight cis white men will get hurt economically and through living in a degraded society, but they will not be forced to carry pregnancies, or be murdered because of their race or their sexual orientation.
And they know that. As long as he hurts those others even more they’re fine with what he does to them.
Yeah the thing is the average trump supporter will be hurt less than everyone else (and that’s the whole point)
I’ve had the joy of working on a python project with strict type checking enforced in CI and wow is it a different experience. Am a big fan.
Don’t worry, people here yell at you for not using profane language because “you can swear on the internet”, they’re a weird bunch.
deleted by creator
They’re different because on Lemmy they’re called comms ;)
Solved by money, there’s nearly no sickness in the world that you can’t get treated effectively if you pay enough for the privelege.
Wrong
The rich don’t love anyone
Wrong
We’re making great strides on this in the medical sector, also solved by money. We don’t have this one truly “solved” yet but I expect a workable solution within 100 years.
Pure fantasy
Not if you upload yourself to Xitter and get turned into a chatbot!
Fair enough
Getting ultra rich won’t save you from suffering. It can put it off a little while, but sickness, loss of loved ones, old age, and death come for us all.
Such an incredibly small number of people want to murder that, even though it would only take <1% of people to get rid of the whole population, we are nowhere near that.
It’s only because people don’t really like being murdered that…
No it’s also, and more importantly, because people don’t like murdering
Nominal battery voltages depend on the chemistry of the cell used, specifically the “oxidation potential” of the cathode and anode materials. You can think of it as “how badly one side of the battery wants to grab electrons from the other side”. 3.7 V is extremely common as it’s the number for common lithium materials. (But the real voltage varies a bit depending on the charge). Multiples of 1.5 V are common because it is the number for alkaline cells and you can get multiples of the voltage by putting several cells in series (end on end). I dont think there are commonly used chemistries with a nominal voltage of 2 V.
He probably understands much more than what he can say, production is always the hardest part of language learning. I’m sure saying something nice with a smile is unlikely to be taken the wrong way.
No, people are just gullible and love to feel like they know something everyone else doesn’t
Ok, now do sugar, and compare the statistical quality of the evidence too please
Camelcase in python, ew, a fundamentalist would do that