

Mint is a Linux distribution, not a window manager. These are KDE Plasma, Gnome, Cinnamon, Sway, labwc, XFCE, etc.
Mint is a Linux distribution, not a window manager. These are KDE Plasma, Gnome, Cinnamon, Sway, labwc, XFCE, etc.
both are still not native and need the XWayland compatibility layer, which is usually (but might be turned off) compiled into your Wayland desktop manager
That screenshot looks disgusting. Unsharp font, irritating icons, weird fontset. Is that GNOME and/or Ubuntu? Terrible.
Canonical is even putting advertisements into apt
ffs. They are insufferable:
distrobox
Why not Hitler? Mao? Stalin? Putin?
Edit: read below it was intended as joke, I’m relieved but still concerned.
But maybe you can explain where all the downvotes come from, because I don’t understand.
Is thievery good? Only when thieving from companies? Is is socially acceptable to take what is not yours from others? Only from companies? Or from a stranger who has more than you? From a friend? What’s this all about?
No, I’m serious in all statements. Corpos will jack prices on any occassion that offers itself, so keep the number of those low.
service is not something the client has to ask for but something the vendor provides. Just like you hold a door open for someone entering behind you, you provide that service, unasked. Having to ask for service is a failure in itself, it’s just “no service”.
“service” is no “special attention” but I get to the conclusion our misunderstanding might be a socio-cultural thing
I don’t know where you live but here theft is a crime and very antisocial and despicable.
Someone has to pay for the thieves and prices rise because they have to compensate for theft. Even if prices in reality do not need to compensate, because margin is already big enough, it gives retail a free card to jack prices, which, in essence, is yet again against consumers.
You mean “rude” in asking for a cashier? Not sure I understand
This says much about respect and social competence in this society when the first instinct is to mock and abuse someone with different priorities than yours.
Yes, that’s what I meant. Looks like my response was not very comprehensible, sorry about that.
I did not recommend to block the trailer for them but to have the suggestion of using blocks in front of the wheels to be enough in the conversation about that trailer being in danger of rolling away.
I’m not sure I understand that
Why wouldn’t you? I suppose they would be thankful because you show considerations about their stuff and wellbeing. Some wooden blocks in front of the weels should probably be enough.
This doesn’t look like food. More like… plastic?
Uh, this sexist “cartoonist” again. Let’s just hate each other, shall we?