• 7 Posts
  • 351 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2024

help-circle








  • moakley@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Oh Eddy Boy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    None of that contradicts what I said. Of course they’re aware of the outsized backlash from the incel community. Of course they need to prepare their stars against the disgusting threats of your cohort. That doesn’t mean the South Park demographic has any financial weight behind it when it comes to Disney Princess movies.

    And none of that even begins to suggest that they actual benefit from the anti-hype, and as I already pointed out, there’s a significant financial disincentive to cast a Black lead, because it loses the Chinese market.

    So you’re just really bad at arguing. Your whole premise is easily dismissed by thinking about it for like a second. You just want to hate on Black Ariel for some reason you refuse to name, and you think that makes you clever. It doesn’t.


  • moakley@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Oh Eddy Boy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    You can’t just do the movie-goer equivalent of “I can’t be racist because I have a black friend”. That doesn’t matter.

    I’m going to assume you believe the following: Disney understands that casting non-white actors as white characters (based on prior depictions) is going to be controversial.

    You assume incorrectly. Their choices are only controversial to chuds. It’s not controversial to anyone without that same ragebait agenda. Chuds happen to be an extremely loud minority, but they don’t buy tickets to children’s princess movies.

    This whole thing is just silly. You think they hired Rachel Zegler not because she was arguably the biggest breakthrough young actress that year and had just won a Golden Globe for her first ever film, but because her skin tone is two shades darker than a 90 year old cartoon? Seriously? You really think that?

    Be serious for a moment, because that’s obviously ridiculous.



  • moakley@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Oh Eddy Boy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So you’re describing a conspiracy theory where you think Disney is the architect of this culture war bullshit because it’s free advertising for their live action remakes.

    That doesn’t hold up to even a little bit of scrutiny.

    • Diverse casting in a remake was a thing for decades before the current culture war situation. Disney cast Brandy as Cinderella in 1997 to absolutely no backlash.

    • The racist backlash doesn’t actually provide any financial benefit for Disney. In fact there’s a significant cost to it, because Chinese audiences won’t see a movie with a Black lead.

    So if you’re being sincere here you should reconsider your stance. Unless there’s some other reason you might want to take that side.


  • moakley@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Oh Eddy Boy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s about making movies for little girls. It’s also about representation.

    I do think Disney was thinking about it, because they saw the backlash and they kept doing it.

    So doing it again in spite of the negative reaction is what it looks like when they care?

    What do you suppose it would look like if they didn’t care what lonely white men think? They’d react directly to their desires and not do it again?

    Does that really make sense?



  • moakley@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Oh Eddy Boy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Disney deliberately makes these choices, knowing it will piss people off,

    Do you really think that Disney was focused on what lonely white men think while casting these actresses for princess movies?

    Because that makes you sound like someone who is so used to being the default demographic for everything that maybe you have trouble processing the idea that this specific thing just isn’t about you.



  • moakley@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Oh Eddy Boy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Charlie Cox as Matt Murdock is the only one that ever bothered me. Not a lot, since Charlie Cox is awesome.

    But there’s still tons of representation for redheaded women in the MCU, and there’s literally no representation for redheaded men. So any time someone makes these arguments and they don’t bring up Matt Murdock (which is literally 100% of the time), I know they’re full of shit.