Although your claims might be true (we’ll see) they don’t address the argument you replied to which is that:
If you think that someone using AI is wrong because of the water or ecological impact then you should think much worse about people who chose to eat a meat burger instead of a vegetable one because the extra water usage and ecological impact are many many orders of magnitudes bigger than an AI prompt causes.
Idk, that water is important to save is the argument OP made, I just added context.
The majority of the plants we grow are fed to animals first which reduces the calories by over 8x. So if anyone wants to reduce their “plant murder” that’s a good place to start.
Not sure why I can’t just eat neither?
Some more context 
Even beekeepers think beekeepers are cruel: https://www.honeybeesuite.com/why-clip-the-wings-of-your-queen/
I knew who posted this before checking
Animals aren’t inanimate objects to be rented
Not sure the killed bird cares about your land area usage statistics
Someone tied up with a fancy rope is still tied up
Unless those shops sell flesh, Jesus’s words don’t really apply to that. He called the priests who practiced slaughter for money “violent robbers”
The last 60% of the message is about yourself. It might feel like you are just explaining yourself but other people perceive that as you defending yourself because you think you were right and shouldn’t have to apologize. Focus on what your friend said, how they might feel and how you are going to try to make them feel more comfortable going forward.