lastweakness

I don’t know how you’ve not encountered a 504 yet if you’re actively using Codeberg. It’s a known issue with a lot of impact.

GitLab’s CI might be better but otherwise, the interface is pretty horrible and no one I know wants to have anything to do with it. I understand that can be subjective but everyone I’ve suggested it to in the past has come back with the same thoughts.

I remember trying radicle in its early days and having issues. Hopefully by now they’ve been resolved. Will check them out again.

I’m not a professor but I’m asked often for advice by students. Both due to open source contributions and also due to friends.

I have no idea why you would assume that. You need to stop thinking in binaries and be pragmatic. All my stuff is already on self-hosted Forgejo. So personally, I’m fine for now.

But genuinely, where am I supposed to tell people to host their stuff? When a college student tells me they want to host their first project somewhere, what is an actually viable answer at this point? My answer would have been Codeberg if not for the 504s, but I’m a bit lost now since that became a daily occurrence, so tell me yours.

Codeberg is constantly 504ing and private repos aren’t encouraged. Sourcehut is paid. GitLab is GitLab. So where are people leaving to?

Self-hosted Photon on PC and Summit on Android.

It could. The removal of “transparency” indicates to me that the clients might also stop being open source at some point and Vaultwarden doesn’t have its own clients.

You were making sense to the Americans up until that last one

Damn, I wish I could choose when to be literate. That sounds like a cool superpower

Do you work for Zed or something?

Nope. I do have a single contribution to Zed and an extension. No attachment to the community or project though. But I do see that they are passionate enough to walk back on decisions that their community tells them is bad.

you’ll be happy Gram exists.

That’s the thing. I don’t think so. Looking at its commit history, Gram is already significantly behind on features and more importantly, fixes. If/when enshittification happens, I’d rather have an up-to-date fork and I’d rather it be a fork for a more valid reason.

Edit: to clarify: I’m not really against gram, i just don’t understand why it exists right now. It also seems like the dev is relatively new to rust. All in all, it just feels like something that should have happened a bit later.

I mean, we could simply fork it when it becomes meaningful to do so, right? Gram, as far as I understand, was created as a reaction to the age requirement in the Zed cloud Terms of Service and to AI, which is already something you can disable entirely (there’s a “disable_ai” settings option dedicated to that). I don’t think that makes much sense.

Practically speaking, why would you pick Gram over Zed? I mean actual advantages

Then they’ll just jail any individuals they can.

Sometimes, I feel like Lemmy lives in this leftist utopia that doesn’t really exist. It’s really weird.

No, they threaten to jail the creator of $LINUX_DISTRIBUTION. I think the best stance is Arch’s current stance of doing nothing and saying nothing.

Okay, something weird just happened to me… When I sent my last comment, I couldn’t perceive it as anything but white and gold… Now, out of nowhere, i can’t perceive it as anything but blue and black… Why? How? What just happened?

Why is it so clearly blue and black in your screenshot?

I don’t think that’s it. I can’t perceive the original image as anything but white and gold. I tried to convince my brain about the lighting situation, but I don’t think it has helped.

Edit: nvm, I misunderstood your comment.

Damn, WSJ really succeeded in their campaign

One day, I will ask you for help and I trust you will be there for me :)

So it’s Microoft

Ah yes, cron, why didn’t I think of that?