

But why would you be so sure it will? What if you never figure it out and you’re permanently stuck in the loop?


But why would you be so sure it will? What if you never figure it out and you’re permanently stuck in the loop?


If he’s aging within the time loop, then the loop will end when he dies. If that happens, he won’t be there for the “final iteration”.


Why would the time loop come to an end?
Yeah this is where I stand right now. Too much shit to deal with to actively seek that company though…
As all the Abrahamic gods have taught us ❤️


It’s directed by Curry Barker, a member of the YouTuber duo “that’s a bad idea”. They do some great skits. The other member, Cooper, plays the character Ian.
Why can’t the same be said about a farm? The only value in a crater of this sort is spectacle and maybe it is interesting from a geological history standpoint. But every piece of land must have its own geological history and I love seeing farms. So what does that mean for land ownership? I personally find the arrogance of man to be interesting and weird at the same time. “Look, we carved up the place that created us and decided we’ll trade them.” It’s simultaneously very animalistic like how big cats have territories and also uniquely awfully engineered just for mankind.
The community would have a lot more benefit from the crater
I mean, someone has to own it. The community? But who in the community? An organization? The local government? Then, what if they charge money? This kinda situation is unavoidable. I’m not saying it should be abolished, I just find it interesting.
Isn’t the concept of land ownership already weird enough?


it cannot be by nature being a RISC implementation.
This statement is just fundamentally wrong. And it looks like someone else explained this better than I did.
There is no core ARM set that has to be implemented by every ARM CPU like x86 does
But there is. There is a base ISA. It looks like you have several fundamental misunderstandings…


Yes, ARM is RISC but it is also well-defined. ARMv9 is backwards compatible with ARMv8. ARMv8 and v9 are 64-bit while ARMv7 and before were 32-bit. Even ARMv9 is technically compatible with ARMv7 because of Aarch32 but that’s optional. ARM’s versioning is more numerous than x86-64 (which also has v2, v3, etc) but that doesn’t mean it’s not well defined.
Is there another way to win?
Then PS1 and PS2 weren’t part of your childhood either right?
I might be stupid but it still doesn’t make any sense to me
Ah, damn, we might have to ask the US military…
We need a new internet


Wasn’t this debunked before? Like, the numbers are correct but there are valid reasons for it?


I’m not the one who started a sentence with “with every intention to offend”… But sure. Also, you might want to look into what “ad hominem” means.
just wanna say everyone here that GNOME isn’t that good.
Except we weren’t talking or asking about how much better KDE is for you. I genuinely don’t care since I already love both desktops. Unlike you, I’m not here to shit on one or the other.
We were discussing the flexibility offered by GNOME’s extensions, which you, with your limited understanding, declared to be something that KDE can match, when that’s just plain untrue just by virtue of how extensions work. You also implied that GNOME core devs are careless about extensions, which they are not. It’s just how GNOME extensions work. It’s a tradeoff for the flexibility, one they’ve tried their best for years to mitigate including offering porting guides. You can take offense to being told you’re ignorant about all of this. But once again, that doesn’t change how reality works.
That all said, I agree that I don’t have the time or energy for this either. But as a software engineer, I really wish people wouldn’t bring in their “opinions” when facts about a piece of software are being discussed… Anyway, i won’t be replying here anymore, so bye


I mean, you can say anything you want. Just doesn’t change reality. GNOME devs do a lot these days to prevent updates from breaking extensions.
KDE also simply doesn’t allow everything GNOME allows. I love KDE and I have past contributions to KDE as well. But pretending they’re on the same level of customizability is delusional. It’s not a helpful or meaningful statement to make, a statement born out of pure ignorance. Plus, you dragged KDE into this, not me. Not everything needs to be a fking desktop war for no fking reason.


Yes, KDE included. I don’t think you understand the level of flexibility that being able to monkey-patch the GNOME shell provides. And I say that as someone who loves both KDE and GNOME for different reasons.
Fair enough