I’m not sure what’s worse. the fact you can understand the incoherence or that you believed any of it.

I will never not cringe at “on accident” instead of “by accident”

euchhhh.

really? you’re supposed to know it’s not Minnesota. SUCH AS AMERICANS.

but I guess you grokked the comment like an average American so there’s that.

yeah and then you forget about one that makes it into a release and then see it in the console.

have you ever smoked weed? ideas are cheap - even ones that seem good. ACTUAL good ideas are only proven good when they are implemented AND become successful.

hey dumfuck, America isn’t the only country in the world. we actually can look at what worked elsewhere.

America didn’t work because Americans like you refused to cooperate.

which apparently doesn’t extend to harming cats by way of imprisonment.

owning pets isn’t about maximizing environmental benefits. your own existence is a much larger problem for that but no one is telling you to live your entire life in a boring box because we have too many humans. this hill is not important enough to warrant all you folks dying on it.

after finding it quite surprising that folks here feel so strongly about forcing such a depressing life on highly independent creatures, I decided to look for the evidence myself.

sure enough, it’s not as clear as you all think. one of the problems with the research is that it is incorrectly applied to all environments without merit. and the biggest issue of all is that most of the problem is caused by feral cats.

so no, your absolute position that all cats must be indoors only is not fully supported by evidence. furthermore it is alarming how quick people are to impose their beliefs on other creatures with only a small amount of reason.

mmmmmega akshully vibes