Trump isn’t the disease, he’s just the most visible symptom.

Fuck, I’m going to try that. Thanks!

Unavoidable timers. For example:

1. Devices with low battery and the charger is out of reach.
2. Drinking a bunch of water.
3. Playing an album with nothing queued afterwards.

Along the same lines: incidental timeboxing. My toaster takes 2 mins, and leaving the kitchen means I’m likely to end up with sad cold toast, so I better stay and deal with some of the kitchen mess in those two minutes. The phrase “if you have time to lean, you have time to clean” has been strangely useful to me.

Allowing things to be partially done, but not in a state where is going to be a big problem. For example, the above kitchen mess.

• A cup and bowl with food left in it will be hard to clean and attracts bugs and grows mold, and that’s a problem.
• An empty but dirty cup and bowl is better but still harder to clean.
• A rinsed cup and bowl filled with water left in the sink is easiest to clean, so that’s the least problematic state to leave it in, and it’s not much harder to do that than it is leaving the food-filled cup and bowl there to begin with.

Australia (the country) wasn’t invaded by the Ottomans or Germans back then.

Japan considered it and did bomb Australia, but they also estimated that anywhere near 45k to 250k people would be needed to invade - before considering shipping supplies for such an effort. There is too much land to cover.

Isolation was the reason they considered doing it at all - Australia made a safe launch base for allied forces. Had it been a smaller region, they may have taken the option. They certainly took the north of New Guinea in the attempt to cut Australia off from other allies.

Isolation is relative though, and even less of a benefit now there are missiles than can hit targets thousands of miles away. You can’t ship supplies with a missile or satellite though.

What Australia both benefits and suffers from is not being powerful enough to be worth paying attention to.

1. Controversy is always going to happen with anything politics, which is clearly something very important to you
2. Your worth is not a measure of the controversy your posts generate or karma
3. Maybe instead of giving up completely, consider also posting about some things that bring you peace and joy. I have no doubt that there is much more to you than very understandable anger about the world we live in.

In my case, I can’t survive on a diet of outrage alone, especially when I’m often picking up my phone to get away from some kind of life stress, so I’m always keen for more posts in art, photography or pet communities. It helps to break up the wall of misery that is the news and reminds me there are still things worth fighting for. Sometimes I need to see a photo of a beach sunset someone saw and thought was pretty, or read a post about how they discovered a new hobby even if I’d never try it. Show me the cute dog you saw on a walk, or the weird random trash you found on the street, I’m here for it.

Consider it a form of community building. rest, and morale boosting for the war against humanity and the environment that we’ve been caught in, if you will.

I’m deeply jealous of your cat that also doesn’t hold a grudge about travelling or having their temperature rudely taken.

What a rad little dude he is.

I’m not telling you to tolerate intolerance. I’m telling you that what you have attacked is something entirely unrelated to their intolerance, and actually perpetuates some of that intolerance.

It’s not like I’d be spared from concentration camps either, I’m part of a few demographics which have been some of the first targets of fascism too.

Dehumanization is a core mechanism of fascism. It’s not possible to eradicate fascism by using its tools. Your statement also stands in stark contrast with your position that empathy is the most important part of a person.

The problem is, we’re all capable of atrocities, even if some are much more easily convinced to participate than others. It’s an uncomfortable truth of being human. But we have the choice to attack the parts which are actually contemptible - their words and actions. Alienating people based on their physical appearance equally alienates the people who perceive themselves to have a physical similarity, even when they hold entirely opposite views. That collateral damage is neither necessary nor desirable.

I don’t doubt they hold ghoulish views, but it has nothing to do with their appearance. They look like older women fetishizing a revolting idol while subscribed to white supremacist ideals about youth and beauty. Describing them as “things” is dehumanizing in a similar way as they would likely dehumanize us. The more ideologically revolting members of our species are still people.

People. They’re people. Objectionable people with grotesque views, but people nonetheless.

What an excellent shot, the photographer must have been very pleased with themselves!

Because they’re using them in their products, or the non-public infrastructure that keeps the product running, or their teams are using them internally.

Check the licenses of the projects you listed. If they allow free commercial use, you can assume those products are key to the software somewhere.

Don’t underestimate how much of big tech is made of OSS - companies will always take free stuff. They pay them because if the projects die or are compromised, so are their paid products.

Probably referencing the 23andme kit mail out Epstein did. Yeah. It’s all pretty dire.

I was going for the idea of fallen royalty and involvement in crime, but I think we can’t rule out the possibility he was also trying to steal his title back so I quite like your read too.

Thanks for your help!

Thanks for letting me know! I’ll be sure to add more context if I post one of these again.

For this one, I guess I should have added that Pizza Express was his alibi for how he could not have met the person who accused him of rape. It was a disastrous interview in 2019 that I expect has come back to haunt him. https://archive.md/mPBis

Thanks, I always try to include them, but I’m never sure whether to keep it as alt text or put it as a caption, or how well alt text works on Lemmy.

Out of curiosity, why do you find them helpful if it’s not for vision reasons? I apologise if that’s too personal a question.

The Epstein files obviously contain a lot of information about rape and trafficking, which is very understandably and rightly in the spotlight. But what the files also contain is very detailed information about exactly how our laws and financial systems are being actively exploited to maintain the power of a select few. That is something that is much harder to write a quick article about, by design, but we haven’t even seen some of these names mentioned in the media:

• de Rothschild (with a very illustrative diagram in EFTA01114424)
• Thiel
• Rockefeller
• Murdoch
• von Habsburg

And those are just individuals, not companies. We haven’t heard anything about JP Morgan Chase, Sotheby’s, Goldman Sachs… Or even the universities like Harvard.

You can’t usually pull a single short damning quote from an email for them because it’s not as simple as the horror of one person raping children, but it lays the foundation of how this horror was allowed to continue at such a large scale by so many people.

Same for Japan. No chance they’re wearing full hiking boots or sneakers inside the house in Japan - the shoe cabinet is built in right next to the front door of houses, tiny apartments, temples, many restaurants, etc. I assume the schools still do too.

Pick Up That Can

Careful of your eyes! I’m pretty sure you need a special filter or telescope for the sun