• 3 Posts
  • 374 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2026

help-circle

  • This was all in school

    Wrote a script that runs on startup and creates a service in the background. It just opened the CD drive at random intervals. I think it was every 300–30,000 seconds

    Wrote a program, again that runs on startup and creates a service. On a much shorter interval every 15–150 seconds, it jiggles the mouse cursor slightly. Just enough to cause a mis-click

    Another program that replaces a full stop keypress with a comma 10% of the time. Really funny for assignments and typing URLs

    Another one ejects the floppy drive at random intervals. This one I never released due to data loss risk

    Another that kills the monitoring software the school I.T. team uses for watching your screen or preventing you playing flash games

    Finally one that makes the computer go BEEP every once in a while

    Basically I was just an annoying troll

    The school I.T. department got really mad at me and banned me from all computers lol






  • Really it’s about constraints yeah?

    • Needs to fit in pocket
    • Needs to be convenient to hold up to your face for phone calls
    • Needs to be small enough to be holdable in one hand (highly individual)
    • Needs to be big enough that you can use the touchscreen effectively (highly individual)

    So really you can just use the size of an average pocket and hand as a guide and go from there. Once it stops fitting in pockets and hands, it has to go in the bag, and typing becomes very difficult as you have to prop up the device, which means people won’t use it as much and get annoyed with it.

    If it’s just battery life, you can get bags and such nowadays with convenient rechargable battery packs in them. You don’t need to change the device at all. If you want more screen size as a bigger person, there’s XL versions of phones. Other than that there’s no reason to get a bigger phone





  • Cheat’s Carbonara. I was practically making it for dinner every night anyway. Start with a basic recipe of spaghetti with olive oil and nutritional yeast. The only change is, don’t pour out all of the pasta water, and add a beaten egg or two with black pepper. Tastier, and more protein too, with almost no additional effort. Parmesan is probably more to most’s taste, but I like nooch.

    Edit: if your eggs are refrigerated you’ll probably need to put it back on the heat for like a minute or two. Accept that you’ll overcook it a few times until you get the timing right.



  • That issue has amazing comments. Including someone who unironically calls themselves an autistic genius with a straight face and is desperately seeking attention.

    Tap for unrecognised genius

    What bothered me is that, not a single person here has tried it - commented on it - given it regard. Because they assume “AI was used” means - Non-technical, AI-psychosis - sycophantic - worthless - low-in-value etc.

    When my work gets disregarded when I know my stuff is top-notch - I can’t help but feel disrespected and incensed by the reasoning.

    Think of it like - you’re a genius. You spend a few hours solving a problem. You drop it into the laps of the people who need that solution badly - and then get told that because you delivered that solution by drone instead of in person - they won’t even engage with it.

    How does that make you feel? Especially when you did it all for free? Least I can get is real engagement. Could’ve just kept it to myself like I was planning to and said F everyone else.

    The feedback is “not” difficult to accept. What’s difficult is ingratitude. Bruh, go tear apart my repo and call me a fool. But telling me you don’t want to even engage because you don’t like AI-generated text is nonsensical.

    The difference between a genius and a crank is often very hard to discern. But usually, you can tell by the difference by which one concedes and scopes their claims and which one doesn’t.

    Name calling? Nice. “Grown an ego” - No, I just don’t like when people are wrong. Calling myself a genius is something new. I never did it before. Took me a long time to accept it was true. Calling myself that on a github comment section is totally extra. I can admit that. I probably have a chip on my shoulder. I can admit that too.

    See? I can admit my faults. I haven’t seen you or the other guy apologize or in anyway-shape-or-form acknowledge my arguments or give them any merit at all. So who really has the ego problem here?

    Botty boi.





  • Seems you’re asking a philosophical question, which wasn’t immediately obvious and others may have missed.

    Loyalty is valuable as an unwritten, intrinsic agreement between parties. If both parties are loyal to each other, it builds trust. Trust then facilitates many things, especially cooperation; there’s less “verification of work” or suspicion, making processes more efficient. Mistakes and slights can be forgiven more easily. You get access to more resources and responsibilities, and become closer to the other party.

    If only one party is loyal, we call that betrayal, which destroys trust and relationships. So there’s both risks and benefits involved with loyalty. You can do things like carefully choose who to be loyal to, but you can never guarantee they will reciprocate. The betrayed party often suffers severe consequences, which leads to interesting conundrums like the prisoner’s dilemma.

    Loyalty is also expected in many social situations, but it’s difficult to tell if someone is being truthful or pretending. Practically, in modern society, there’s very little benefit to be loyal to large groups of people such as corporations or political parties. It’s fundamentally a unilateral relationship, and gives you no benefit other than membership, with an almost guaranteed betrayal as you never actually accumulated any real trust or relationship with the larger entity. In these cases it’s best to assume both parties are feigning loyalty for social politeness reasons and not accidentally become truly loyal.

    In contrast, it’s a different story at the smaller, more human levels; such as clubs, romantic partners, family, etc. You’re much more likely to receive benefits of trust, and less likely to be betrayed (in comparison). Of course it still happens a lot, but that’s just life.



  • It probably still works. Have you tried actually contacting the author if you have their contact details? You’d be surprised how often this works. They might be willing to relist it on Google or even just send you an .apk you can install. Up to you how much you trust installing a random unverified .apk but that’s a separate question