I agree in general but slight nitpick:

When somebody declares intent to harm you, proportional violence becomes justified as self defence.

If you say you want to hit me on my pinky finger, I’m not justified in killing you. If you declare to kill or eradicate me, as the extreme right does to certain marginalised groups, a lot of different levels of violence are justified, including killing for the really severe cases.

Ah gotcha, now I understand what you mean exactly and I agree.

Nope, the one who pays the bills decides. If you disagree that’s fine. You are free to host your own instance, where the users can decide how much space they want to take up for saving old pictures.

You directly said, and I quote

Eating them shouldn’t be so taboo when considering that little tidbit.

Sorry that I take your words as what they mean literally instead of trying to make them mean what I think they should mean. At that point I can just talk to the voices in my head instead., no need for a social platform then.

And it was meant more with a smiley afterwards then a serious accusation.

“Talk about” are two very important words that were missing from your original comment. Like the difference a comma makes between “Let’s eat grandpa” and “Let’s eat, Grandpa”.

No I’m talking about you saying that it should be not taboo to eat what you fuck.

Normal people very much differentiate between what they eat and what they fuck.

That’s not true at all. The aegian sea is something like 215,000 km2 (83,000 sq mi for you football field lovers out there).

And don’t underestimate “the technology of the time”.

We nowadays have evidence of wide trade networks all over Europe and northern Africa during the bronze age. In Spain there is evidence of tin being used that was mined in northern Europe. People very much used water ways for trade and exchange, which is one of the reason why most old big cities are next to water ways.

Do you think it’s a good idea to combine those people in one location to concentrate resources on how to help them or do you think its a bad idea due to them exchanging information on how to be more effective?

Try necromancy! Undead flaming kittens, what could go wrong?

I understand you, but try to see it from a different perspective: by admitting your error you are in fact taking their ammunition away! Continue on and if they try to bring it up again and again you can ask them why they can’t move on, do they have a problem?

hm check iron level is something I read with other symptoms I show as well…maybe it is time to do just that.

I mean, when I see videos of animals yawning, like lions, I get the urge myself to yawn. So definitely a complex topic.

True, thanks for the addition! I forgot to mention that.

As far as I understood it, yes, a black hole, or rather the event horizon around it, is perfectly round. The problem you describe is that you can’t see the black hole, as that is the whole point of why they are called black. What you can see though, is the light behind the hole that gets “blocked”, creating a seemingly literal black hole in space.

But that is not the whole truth, because you do in fact see the light behind it. Since the gravity of the hole bends space time around it and you can indeed see the part that is behind it, albeit distorted around the event horizon. What you describe as changing view from up or down is indeed just the different view behind the hole, not the hole itself.

Oh, that construction crew sounds interesting, can you tell me the name?

Honestly, it helps with the suspension of disbelief. Some local author tried to tell urban fantasy stories in my home town… Its just too silly for me to read about a werewolf/vampire/alien fighting on the street I cross to get to the supermarket.

And of course it is absolutely masturbatoric, same as Japan and aliens invading Tokyo.

The manager of Elvis Presley sold “I hate Elvis” buttons. So yes, that is definitely a thing and older than you might think.

I agree with you, as long as no real child is involved, nobody got hurt, so I don’t care. And I also think having a fictional pressure release is preferable to a real one.

But that is not really the topic here. This is about the term lolicon and how a lot of pedophiles hide behind that term. In my opinion the translation in the picture is correct. That has nothing to do with censorship, as the tweet tries to portray it as.

Why are half the words missing in your version? Here is the original: