Sigh

Updoot

What th-

Wait. Never mind. I didn’t ask. I didn’t finish the question so you legally cannot answer. Per the… Geneva Convention. Yeah. That sounds right.

There were some lesser ones as well. Jeans was one. And Xavier: Renegade Angel. Probably others that I missed or am forgetting.

Given how much thought a lot of superfans of the Bible give to him, you’d think he was the protagonist.

Maybe they’re secret shippers.

ITT: Lemmys don’t like being told what to do, apparently.

Claude’s a gatcha.

Will you get the rare following instructions loot or the deletes-your-whole-prod-environment loot that you already have 10 of?

Possibly the scariest cult.

Username checks out.

Is this position against lookup or read-only db tables?

Largely, yes.

The kind of cases where I’ve seen people stick things in the database that I thought would better be elsewhere:

• If it’s small and doesn’t need to change between releases, you can save all the moving-part kind of overhead of pulling that data from the database just by throwing that data in the source code. Often times people do this just so they can have a “foreign key” to something in the data in question. But a nice, semantic “enum” sort of field in the database can refer to something static that’s already in memory no problem.
• If it needs to change at an administrator’s or developer’s (or manager’s) whim, it’s probably configuration, not dynamic data. In the Java ecosystem, Spring Cloud Config makes it easy to change configuration without releasing the code. (I mean, in a perfect world, releasing should be as easy and straightforward as changing configuration, but not everyone lives in a company where all the managers have read The Phoenix Project and caught the DevOps bug.) Putting configuration in the database tends to create a big audit trail gap, unless you spend a bunch of effort building a custom audit trail kind of system.
• If it’s big and not (very?) relational, it may be better suited for files in a directory. This can be true even if it does change based on user input. (Users uploading images, for instance.)

Mind you, certain kinds of behind-the-scenes users can still qualify as “users” for purposes of considering whether “it needs to change based on user input”. For instance, if your marketing department (without software engineering expertise) needs to be able to mess around (without software engineering assistance) with marketing materials displayed on customer-facing websites, you probably need a content-management system of some sort, and I don’t think the database is necessarily a bad place to store a lot of that information. (Things like images probably shouldn’t go in the database, but metadata about those images are probably quite reasonable data for the database.)

Also, I’m rethinking the term “user input”. I could certainly see it being reasonable for automated systems to put data in the database. Like, if you have a scraper doing stuff to be displayed to end users, that doesn’t belong in the source code or configuration, and if it’s very relatioal, it could well belong in the database. Maybe it’d be better to say “if it doesn’t change based on client input, it doesn’t belong in the database.”

I’m not trying to be a dick. I’m telling you much (perhaps most) of our “disagreement” is you disagreeing with things I never said.

If it doesn’t have to change based on user input, it doesn’t belong in the database.

Oh my god. I’m not the only one who thinks this!

Good catch. Thanks.

You won’t believe what he looked like after smoking only one marijuana.

Perineum Sunning^wikipedia (SFW, surprisingly.)

PHP is dead, learn Brainfuck

Wikipedia has a known set of ideological bias

If “holotropic breathwork can be dangerous” is bias, then everyone else seems “biased” as well.

I did a DDG search for “holotropic breathwork” and looked at the first 5 (actually 6 because one wouldn’t load) links for references to hand and face cramping and to any dangerous effects:

• “If not done carefully, holotropic breathing can cause reduced carbon dioxide and other alterations in blood chemistry that can lead to dizziness, fainting, weakness, spasms of the hands and feet, and even seizures.” “For anyone considering trying holotropic breathing, it is a good idea to discuss possible risks with your healthcare provider before embarking on this alternative practice, especially if you have any of the following conditions: [long list that I’ll omit]”. The “if not done carefully” if taken out of context seems at first perhaps to support your take that it’s only dangerous if done wrong. But the second quote I gave makes it clear that even “doing it right” if you have, say, seizures or heart disease is in fact “doing it wrong”. I.e. it’s dangerous for some individuals. (Such as Michael Pollan who has a history of heart disease.)
• <page wouldn’t load for me>
• “Talk to your doctor before attending if you have: [list omitted]”
• “The physiological effects—tingling, temporary muscle cramping—resolve when normal breathing resumes. Certain conditions (cardiovascular disease, seizure history, pregnancy, among others) require medical consultation first.”
• “This practice is not recommended for individuals with: Heart conditions… Neurological disorders… Severe mental health conditions… Pregnancy” Doesn’t mention hand/face cramping.
• “You’ll want to avoid this type of breathwork if you have a history of: Cardiovascular issues, high blood pressure…”. Also doesn’t mention hand/face cramping.

If your take is that it’s always safe for everyone “if done correctly”, then your take is the outlier, not mine.

…holotropic breathwork specifically as uniquely dangerous as compared to any other kind of breathwork…

I never said anything about whether other kinds of breathwork are or aren’t (sometimes, comparatively) dangerous.

…don’t single out one narrow practice…

If I said “boxing carries a risk of concussion”, would you say I was “singling it out” from among other sports that also carry a risk of concussion? (MMA, American football, etc.) I’m not singling anything out. I said nothing about whether ther other forms of breathwork carry risks or not. I’m only “singling out” doing holotropic breathwork from (all else being equal) not doing holotropic breathwork.

…based on one experience you had…

Read more carefully. I never said I believed holotropic breathwork to be dangerous in some cases from my own experience. I said quite the opposite. My own experience didn’t harm me. Taken in isolation, my own experience supports your assertion that it’s safe (though taken in isolation, it’s only an anecdote, so hardly conclusive proof that it’s safe for everyone). I believed holotropic breathwork to be potentially dangerous in some cases before my own experiment and before reading How to Change Your Mind. Neither of those were what convinced me. The preponderance of writings I’d found on the topic did and continue to.

Speaking of which, you’ll notice that Michael Pollin says that it’s CO2 levels in the blood, not holotropic breathwork specifically…

Michael Pollan (whose name you keep misspelling) did specifically call the practice he’d been led in “holotropic breathwork” in the passage I quoted.

And so does Ketoacidosis - the keto diet…

The keto diet causing ketoacidosis is not typical. The keto diet (purposefully) causes “ketosis”, but that’s distinct from ketoacidosis. Ketosis doesn’t alter blood pH. Wikipedia: “While ketosis refers to any elevation of blood ketones, ketoacidosis is a specific pathologic condition that results in changes in blood pH and requires medical attention.”.

…so had his experiment been about the keto diet, he would have had the same results.

If he had risk factors for the keto diet putting him in ketoacidosis, maybe. The keto diet can be dangerous in some cases. “Doing it right” is only safe if “doing it right” includes taking into account any risk factors one might have and being open to abstaining if the risk is too high. (And even then, the risk would never be zero.) Which is exactly what I’ve been saying about holotropic breathwork. Michael Pollan had exactly some of the risk factors which could make holotropic breathwork dangerous for him. Whether he has additional risk factors that would contraindicate the keto diet for him, I don’t know, nor do I know if his heart condition would specifically contraindicate the keto diet absent other conditions.

But if you’re running into negative experiences…

Again, you’re reading what I said and making up your own interpretation exactly contrary to what I said. I never said I had a negative experience beyond being “scared” and “weirded out” enough to end the experiment. (Mind you, I knew to expect the hand/face cramping as it had been mentioned in a lot of material that I had read on the topic.) I didn’t have any of the sort of “theraputic” effects that are the reason why people who seek holotropic breathwork seek it. But again, nothing negative came of the experience.

…what was the difference between what you did and the people that have a lovely time?

Again, my best guess is “I might have gotten into more of that territory had I kept going longer”.

And you can’t really call a guy that wrote This if Your Mind on Plants and takes mescaline and goes off caffeine as not willing to try anything.

Sure. I’ll concede the point. I’m not sure what that has to do with the rest of the conversation, though.

…you should say just “some breathwork has potential dangers.”

That’s exactly what I’ve been saying across three comments now.

If you jump in a pool and to pranayama and breath retention and pass out, you can drown. Which was in Scott Carney’s book about Wim Hof. Not ideal, right? Yet, not holotropic, either. Second, eating a sandwich can lead to choking and death. Eating shellfish can lead to negative reactions and death. Eating too many eggs can lead to death.

Just in: things that aren’t holotropic breathwork can be dangerous in some cases, ergo holotropic breathwork isn’t.

I’m asking you to be specific and look at what you’re calling dangerous and why. Take a step back and be objective and specific.

I have been. You just don’t seem to comprehend written English.

I mean, Wikipedia seems to contradict a lot of what you’re telling me. Not to say Wikipedia can’t be wrong, but it’s not like anything I said about holotropic breathwork came out of nowhere.

Wikipedia specifically calls out the face and hand cramping thing. It also mentions a potential risk of seizure based on a 1993 report which may well be outdated at this point. Wikipedia also says “it should not be attempted alone” which seems to contradict your take that “A trip sitter seems unnecessary, IMO”. So at very least even if your take is more correct, it doesn’t sound like it’s uncontroversial.

I’ve never heard Michael Pollan called an “I’ll try anything” author, but also you’ll note from my comment that I didn’t get from him the idea that holotropic breathwork was associated with some risks to your health. I already had that understanding before reading his book. (I read his book not knowing that holotropic breathwork would come up.) And I’m not sure what you mean by “projecting” in that context. Here’s a quote from How to Change Your Mind talking about his experience with holotropic breathwork:

Then something frightening happened. Fritz had gone up to the house to prepare our dinner, leaving me to make some notes about the experience on my laptop, when all at once I felt my heart surge and then begin to dance madly in my chest. I immediately recognized the sensation of turbulence as AFib, and when I took my pulse, it was chaotic. A panicky bird was trapped in my rib cage, throwing itself against the bars in an attempt to get out. And here I was, a dozen miles off the grid smack in the middle of nowhere.

It went on like that for two hours, straight through a subdued and anxious dinner. Fritz seemed concerned; in all the hundreds of breathwork sessions he had led or witnessed, he had never seen such a reaction. (He had mentioned earlier a single fatality attributed to holotropic breathwork: a man who had an aneurism.) Now I was worried about tomorrow, and I think he was too. Thought he also wondered if perhaps what I was feeling in my heart might reflect some psychic shift or “heart opening.” I resisted the implied metaphor, holding firm to the plane of physiology: the heart is a pump and this one is malfunctioning.

And a footnote:

I subsequently learned that hyperventilation, which plays a role in breathwork, changes the CO2 levels in the blood, which in turn can alter the rhythms of the heart in some people. What I assumed was a physiologically benign alternative to MDMA turns out to be nothing of the kind; even without a drug, it is possible to change one’s blood chemistry in ways that can affect heart rhythms.

What am I “projecting onto” Michael Pollan exactly?

Tell you what. I’ll edit “seems dangerous” to “seems potentially dangerous”.

So, based on this, evidence suggests you might have simply not done it right.

If your reasoning is that the fact that I didn’t have “some sort of interesting experience” means I wasn’t doing it right, I basically admitted to that in my previous comment. “I might have gotten into more of that territory had I kept going longer”.

If your reasoning is that the had hand and face cramping is evidence that I was doing it wrong, that’s in fact the usual effect of “doing it right”. I don’t have any reason to think the cramping effect in particular was dangerous, nor did I say it was.

If he mentions driving a car, do you also groan and think “Don’t do it!”?

If he’d previously mentioned specific reasons why he couldn’t possibly drive safely, of course I’d have had concerns with him driving. He’d mentioned previously in the book that he had a history of heart issues and so I thought it concerning that he’d do something like holotropic breathwork. (Also, I never said anything about “groaning”.)

Breathwork alone can easily get you to a weird, fun place.

Oh yeah. I’ve heard lots of wild stuff about some of the holotropic kind of breathwork. I even did it once, but I don’t really trust it. Seems potentially dangerous. Plus, I read How to Change Your Mind by Michael Pollan a while ago and he had a real scare of a near-medical-emergency from that. (To be fair, he’s got heart issues, so that definitely contributed.) I remember reading that part of the book hearing the bit leading up to the holotropic breathwork and thinking “oh, god, don’t do it Michael; you’ll regre-… oh god he did it.” Lol. He had a choice between MDMA and breathwork and because his doctor told him to avoid amphetamines because of his heart, he opted for the breathwork, and I knew that might not really be that much safer. It doesn’t seem he had any long-lasting negative effects. Just a spell of irregular heartbeat or something (I don’t remember more specifically than “or something”). But yeah.

All that happened the time I tried it myself was a bit of tingling and a lot of hand and face… I dunno. Cramping? Spasming? Like, my muscles seized up and I couldn’t relax them. Not enough to be painful. Just enough to be weirded out. No psychedelic-y sort of effects or anything like that for me personally. I might have gotten into more of that territory had I kept going longer, but who knows. I didn’t have any guide or trip sitter or whatever, so I got scared and aborted when something weird happened. I don’t remember how long those effects lasted, really, but it wasn’t all day or anything.

Especially in the early days of the recent Kratom “boom”, I definitely heard a lot of people call it “not a drug”. I think kindof in the same way as there are lots of psychoactive substances that people don’t consider “drugs”. (Chamomile that I listed in my OP, for instance. People feed that shit to their little kids and don’t think of it even slightly like they think of alcohol or hard drugs or whatever. But that shit’s a GABA agonist just like alcohol, GHB, and benzos. There’s definitely a sense of the word “drug” in which chamomile is super duper for sure yes a drug.) I think mostly those folks were in deep denial. It’s not just a drug, but a pretty concerning one for its addiction potential if nothing else. But still, I’ve heard people say it’s “not a drug”. So, yeah. I think it counts for purposes of this thread.