https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1489428/

First season was a bit procedural, but S2 may be the best season of TV of anything. Other seasons were great too, and it had the best ending of any TV show I’ve seen.

Based on some of the works of Elmore Leonard (author of the books movie like Get Shorty and Jackie Brown are based on) it’s about an old school cowboy kind of guy by the name Raylan Givens (Timothy Olyphant)… but in modern times. So cowboys vs. gangsters kind of thing.

Here’s the opening scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ho2_c_LGZfk

Raylan isn’t the most interesting character, interesting enough though because it is questioned whether he’s creating situations so he can kill people, what the influence his father (a violent abusive criminal) had on him, etc. But it’s kinda like Batman TAS, where the villains are the really interesting part of it. The main villain, Boyd Crowder (Walton Goggins), is kinda like the Joker because he knows the hero is going to win and makes all of his schemes around that.

You can skip City Primeval tho, it’s kinda pointless other than the last five minutes.

So you’re making excuses for antisemitism instead of speaking out against it? You’re more afraid to do the right thing because you’re afraid of what your little hate group will think of you.

Just search for “palestinian protests at synagogues”

If you’re protesting at a synagogue in Canada you’re protesting Canadian Jews, not Israel. You’re against Jews in general, which is the definition of the word “antisemitism”.

Seems a little confusing of an analogy to choose with all the antisemitism going on these days.

Also not sure why you’d choose an uprising that failed to overthrow the Nazis, with many of the people involved dying in the attempt or dying in death camps shortly afterwards. The most of those that survived all of that immigrated to Israel or the US.

I’m not sure what you’re saying your goal is when this is the analogy you choose.

Who do you think you are in this scenario? Would you be with the guys using violence against Jews or would you be on the side that was against those guys?

Yes, your stochastic terrorism is indeed ok with the US President. You’re helping him by giving him a boogey man to justify oppression.

And stochastic terrorism is okay with you?

As long as it’s some other nutjob that kills some people and gets killed or jailed for life and negatively impacts the non-violent resistance movements, I guess it’s all okay with you?

You’re like that annoying kid in elementary school that’s always trying to get the other kids to fight for your own amusement. Psychopath behaviour.

This is the story arc for the aliens in Prometheus.

I’ll have to check that out… I really liked Yojimbo.

• Justified
• Tombstone
• Unforgiven

The harburgler of doom. Robble robble!

How poetic.

First we need to endlessly debate whether or not Kamala Harris would’ve done the same thing. Since we can never know we can all just assume posting shitty memes is more important than voting. We’ll tell each other it’s late stage capitalism so we can feel smart for doing nothing because it’s all going to collapse anyway, nothing we can do! Committed to being uncommitted! Apathy to the end!

Yes lemmy indeed has a bit of a Nazi bar problem, with all the antisemitism that gets posted here unchallenged.

You know the old saying, when life gives you oranges… NO TEENS IN THE PARK!

It’s talks about Russia and Iran doing some bad things and doing some sanctions. I’m not sure what you’re getting at with this?

Unwilling to have discussion indicates you’re afraid you might be wrong about things and discussion may bring that to light.

People who have thought through their positions aren’t afraid to discuss them. I could be wrong about some things, but if that’s the case then and a discussion brings that out, I can change my position, and then I hold stronger positions on issues.

Propagandists that are just repeating slogans are afraid to discuss the topics they supposedly care about passionately. If discussions bring to light their slogans are wrong, then that decreases their standing within their movement which is just a tribal group. The goal of the propagandist isn’t to further a cause it’s only to show loyalty to the tribe and increase their standing.

So go ahead and throw insults at me to prove your loyalty to the tribe. It only proves you’re incapable of growing your movement because you’re incapable of having a rational discussion. If you’re constantly promoting feelings of hatred to impress the political group you’re in, consider the possibility that you might be in a hate group.

If people here were saying racist shit about Palestinians I’d be arguing with them. I don’t see that happen on this site, but I see there’s a bit of an antisemitism problem and that’s something someone needs to address. When people get into a bubble like this and are constantly doing stochastic terrorism talk, some fucked up things can happen if no one pipes in to make people consider they might be going off the rails a little bit.

So I’m taking a break from countering racism and stochastic terrorism on this site to poke some fun at some leftists in a shitpost thread.

Is this really the best forum to discuss genocide? If you’re looking at my comment history, maybe just reply to one of the comments where that’s already being discussed. Well if you can get in a reply before my comments get deleted, that is. Not sure if that happens in an attempt the censor other points of views or to sane-wash out the crazy replies I get when I merely offer the point of view that most people in the world hold about a subject. Either way, at least some people that see them are reminded that not everyone in the world believes the crazy things that get posted here. You obviously saw some of my comments before they got deleted, so that’s a win.

I’ve had multiple people thank me for doing this in my DMs, so there’s dozens of us! And it saddens me the intimidation tactics that get used to squelch discussion of certain subjects on this site.

So, anyway stochastic terrorism is bad, antisemitism is bad, and socialism has failed many times in history. Lets see if I get banned from the “shitpost” community for saying these outrageous things, LOL.

It’s possible some dumbass got into power and had some goons put the spider into the glass and put tariffs on importing silk. The spider is dead and we’ll never know if the spider would be dead had there been a competent in charge. But socialists are 100% certain the spider was going to die anyway because they believe all spiders will inevitably die because some weirdo with a big beard said something about spiders a couple hundred years ago.

Metaphorically speaking, of course.

Or a metaphor for socialism… lacking the economic freedom to buy more silk, the spider couldn’t escape an artificially designed system run by a central authority that didn’t predict this scenario, because it isn’t feasible for a central authority to predict every scenario.

Or maybe, given that the looks like the glass is outside on the ground so maybe the spider was put into the glass on purpose to make the photo? So the spider was sent to a gulag to die because it wasn’t ideologically pure enough.

Or maybe it’s just a spider in a glass and you can stretch a metaphor in any direction you want.